Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Civil Liberties

snot

(11,128 posts)

4. That is the only way the TX law could stand,

Reply to Kablooie (Reply #1)

Sat Sep 4, 2021, 03:14 PM

Sep 2021

as far as I can see (though I'm no expert).

The S. Ct.'s action in this case is almost like a sort of ignominious heads-up to women of an intention – to overturn Roe – that they know to be shameful: women had better either stop having sex or plan to have babies.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Seriously: re- the legal issues re- the TX anti-abortion law [View all] snot Sep 2021 OP

The theory is that no clinic can afford to flaunt the law so ... Kablooie Sep 2021 #1

That is the only way the TX law could stand, snot Sep 2021 #4

Could it be this sneaky enforcement method is a skirting of... brush Sep 2021 #2

Exactly snot Sep 2021 #3