Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Alexander Of Assyria

(7,839 posts)
2. Don't see the cause for alarm raised by the Twitter person.
Thu Dec 30, 2021, 06:51 PM
Dec 2021

Federal law enforcement officers have qualified immunity against lawsuits.

One point in the lawsuit involves the fourth amendment right to be free from arbitrary search and seizure. Law enforcement is protected from lawsuits, except as permitted by previous precedent. It’s routing claim. The fourth amendment defence of the administration is also routine.

The first amendment claim is novel, involves the defendant officer retaliating against the plaintiff for the plaintiffs complaining to his supervisors of the fourth amendment violation.

The administration is merely claiming there should not be a new novel carve out to permit lawsuits claiming violations of free speech.

Very narrow fact situation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Civil Liberties»Good afternoon. The Biden...»Reply #2