Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Civil Liberties

Leme

(1,092 posts)

2. the jury on one of my posts did that

Reply to Erich Bloodaxe BSN (Reply #1)

Tue Jun 10, 2014, 07:48 PM

Jun 2014

on another in same thread.. perhaps not.
-
the fact or issue that perhaps the alerter did not understand post may have lead them astray.
-
I am sort of thinking that both the alerter and the person being claimed as in violation should BOTH be able to comment before a jury makes a decision
-
yeah, I try to put post in context and go through prior posts in thread. Some people troll you until your last post seems inappropriate or worse

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I wonder if people can read at times [View all] Leme Jun 2014 OP

I don't like the way the jury thing is set up. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #1

the jury on one of my posts did that Leme Jun 2014 #2

That makes sense too. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #3

it gets tricky on the time allowed. Leme Jun 2014 #4