Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LGBT Civil Rights and Activism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

6502

(256 posts)
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 06:20 AM Nov 2012

A Black man's opinion on LGBT rights... [View all]

... LGBT rights are equivalent to the Civil Rights Movement.

And as a Black person, it is easy to see the connection.

LGBT rights is NOT equivalent to the right to smoke marijuana.

The right to smoke marijuana shares characteristics with the prohibition of alcohol back the day.

And you do not need to be Black to see the difference.

Why do I feel like I have to make this point?

One more time:

LGBT = Civil Rights Movement = Women's Movement = ... you see where this is going...
"Want to smoke weed " DOES NOT EQUAL "any form of civil rights"


I've noticed messages popping up on DU since Obama got re-elected suggesting that there is some kind of Civil Rights connection between LGBT rights and pot. It's like the weeders are trying to high-jack another unrelated issue to push their cause... to create a meme that pushes their cause.

And frankly, by doing so, essentially cheapens and reduces the LGBT Civil Rights issues, The Civil Rights issues of the 60s around race, and the Women's movement to the same level of prohibition of alcohol at best --- and the right to engage in the active sale, trafficking, and consumption of illegal substances.

I saw this play out on some Maher video on the site, but my browser crashed and I lost the link.

That was the last straw!!!!

As a Black man, I have to see this. LGBT rights is equivalent.
I wont go through the details of what qualities we share... I'm sure we all know.

It's these parasitic pro-drug types that, I think, know the difference, but care so much more about wanting to do their stuff anywhere they want, that they are willing to cheapen everything else around them to get it.

I've lost my patience today.

Anyway, that's it.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I hear your point Skittles Nov 2012 #1
Actually, I do cruise the Weed/Drug threads... let me explain it... 6502 Nov 2012 #7
I actually agreed with S.E. Cupp when she blasted Andrew Sullivan about that on catbyte Nov 2012 #2
Yea fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #6
But Prometheus_unbound Nov 2012 #3
Agreed, but . . . brush Nov 2012 #4
No... if you want to go for the "equivalency argument"... 6502 Nov 2012 #9
What the hell are you talking about brush Nov 2012 #11
Please... it's your responsibility to defend the position you support and proposed... 6502 Nov 2012 #16
Agree Mostly fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #5
. Prometheus_unbound Nov 2012 #8
My God... this outcome was as I expected. FAIL. 6502 Nov 2012 #10
Tie It Back to LBGT Rights fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #13
I did... click the link in the body of this post.... 6502 Nov 2012 #17
Nah fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #19
qwfrg Prometheus_unbound Nov 2012 #12
Tie It Back to LBGT Rights fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #14
No problem, here comes the cut... 6502 Nov 2012 #15
My Case? fightthegoodfightnow Nov 2012 #18
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»LGBT Civil Rights and Activism»A Black man's opinion on ...»Reply #0