Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

appal_jack

(3,813 posts)

6. Forget 2nd Amendment issues; this violates the 1st, 4th, and 5th.

Reply to SecularMotion (Original post)

Thu Sep 10, 2015, 11:17 AM

Sep 2015

So a municipality wants to compel the production of recorded media (1st Amendment violation), and routinely search such privately-owned media (4th Amendment violation), wherein images of customers engaging in lawful transactions might be used against them in a form of involuntary testimony (5th Amendment violation).

But sure, gun-grabbers always respect the Constitution.

-app

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

San Francisco’s Last Gun Shop Standing Could Be Forced to Close Because of New City Ordinance [View all] SecularMotion Sep 2015 OP

I don't want to get dragged into this argument, but mahatmakanejeeves Sep 2015 #1

the article says he does gejohnston Sep 2015 #5

Naturally all of the Controllers who assure us they support the right to self-defense and Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2015 #2

"videotape all gun sales " agree beergood Sep 2015 #3

And surely you must be sarisataka Sep 2015 #4

Forget 2nd Amendment issues; this violates the 1st, 4th, and 5th. appal_jack Sep 2015 #6

3 words, Secmo: County Line Liquors. (nm) Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #7

Murder rate up 71%? One store? Eleanors38 Sep 2015 #8