Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jimmy the one

(2,771 posts)
10. explain yourself
Fri Sep 25, 2015, 03:05 PM
Sep 2015

johnston: post hoc ergo propter hoc

Where did I make any correlation/causation remark? you just can't toss out the maxim whenever you have little relevant to say about anything, and use it as a coverall to try to appear smart. You need justify what you're talking about, & I doubt you can here.

johnston: also, criminals don't get their guns through legal means, therefore "gun friendly" is irrelevant.

Gong. Lotsa criminals got their guns while they were 'non criminals', either law abiding gun owners, or defacto criminals who hadn't been convicted or charged yet. You born yday?
Where you come up with 'gun friendly'? and why is it irrelevant? you again make non specific broad remarks without explaining much of anything whatsoever.

johnston: As for your incoherent rant

Written in plain english? your use of emoticons impresses children a lot I'll bet. Was that one of you 'ROFL' or ROFLAO'?
But why were you laughing? if you couldn't understand it, what made you laugh?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Where are the boundaries ...»Reply #10