Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Replacing white people to kill gun rights [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)33. Who is it, do you think, thats going to bring a second amendment case...
Just one vote, or one judge away from over ruling these activist, conservative judges, that changed 200 years of the 2nd being a collective right, along with Citizens United, being overturned.
Amendment 2 was never a collective right, outside the minds of those who don't like guns.
Thank you for bringing up Judge Stevens dissent so I could post what he actually said in it. Every one needs to read it and not just go buy what people say about it. I think it was very well written and spot on.
I guess you didn't actually read the entire dissent, or you wouldn't continue the beating of the 'collective rights' dead horse:
The question presented by this case is not whether the
Second Amendment protects a collective right or an
individual right. Surely it protects a right that can be
enforced by individuals. But a conclusion that the Second
Amendment protects an individual right does not tell us
anything about the scope of that right.
Second Amendment protects a collective right or an
individual right. Surely it protects a right that can be
enforced by individuals. But a conclusion that the Second
Amendment protects an individual right does not tell us
anything about the scope of that right.
Oops!
And lastly, who is it, do you think, thats going to bring a second amendment case, into a supreme court known to be hostile to it?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

You have a very fertile mind and great skill finding souces rife with confirmation bias
Surf Fishing Guru
Nov 2015
#74
The NRA and accomplices managed to change the reading of the Second Amendment...
Human101948
Oct 2015
#8
"...articles written by noted politcal analysts Chuck Norris, Pat Boone and Charlie Daniels."
beardown
Oct 2015
#22
Gee, SecMo, someone was complaining in ATA 'bout using RW sources in gun discussions.
Eleanors38
Oct 2015
#17