Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

CompanyFirstSergeant

(1,558 posts)
21. Yes, actually...
Sun Mar 6, 2016, 08:24 PM
Mar 2016

I own five Smith and Wesson revolvers, manufactured from the 1980s thru just before the Infernal Locking Mechanism became a standard feature.

I had to do minor gunsmithing on three of them right out of the box.

Mostly due to minor quality issues typical of S&W the late '70s thru '80s.

After that, they worked great and I am very proud to own them (and to be passing them on to the next generation)

I have also sent three of the five out to Robar for the black shiny coating.

Problems I've had on the range:

- One 'case under extractor' - actually it was my son who had this problem on my old service revolver - he hit the ejector rod too hard and the ejector jumped over the rim of one round.(solved with a little training and care)

- One time my snub 357 locked closed due to a loose ejector rod after several boxes of hot loads (solved with lock-tite)

- Two FTFs with cheap ammo. Both times I just dry fired until the bad round came up and each went off on the second try.

Mind you this if over a span of over 30 years.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think the "smart gun" is a terificc innovation, but unless the tech. can be adapted to napi21 Feb 2016 #1
It has to start somewhere, someplace, sometime. SecularMotion Feb 2016 #3
Never thought I would agree with you about anything, but I do on this. The Green Manalishi Mar 2016 #12
First get rid of the laws that mandate their use hack89 Feb 2016 #2
But but but 1!1!! flamin lib Feb 2016 #4
Misrepresentation. Straw Man Feb 2016 #5
That's at least his *second* misrepresentation today alone. From the other group: friendly_iconoclast Feb 2016 #6
Those gun fails are just a few of oh so reliable dumb guns because flamin lib Mar 2016 #9
guns don't go through ANY testing before being offered to the buyer sarisataka Mar 2016 #10
That's his second and third misrepresentations *in this thread alone*, and his 4th in two days... friendly_iconoclast Mar 2016 #13
You miss the point again. Straw Man Mar 2016 #11
Yeaaaaah...gun manufacturers have no QC on their products Press Virginia Mar 2016 #17
How about after years/decades of not used and just sitting in the closet? Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2016 #7
Where did anyone anyone anywhere say, "before they can enter the sales market"? Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2016 #8
Nowhere, of course. It's just more pious fraud from the control types friendly_iconoclast Mar 2016 #14
Well, they are smarter and morally superior to all of us DonP Mar 2016 #15
Good demo shadowrider Mar 2016 #20
All things tech... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2016 #16
All things tech... CompanyFirstSergeant Mar 2016 #18
Ever have a revolver jam or fail eject? discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2016 #19
Yes, actually... CompanyFirstSergeant Mar 2016 #21
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Smart Gun Symposium detai...»Reply #21