Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

flamin lib

(14,559 posts)

9. I'm just using the gun nut tactic of being excruciatingly precise.

Reply to Eleanors38 (Reply #7)

Mon Mar 7, 2016, 06:01 PM

Mar 2016

According to the OP the article said CAPABLE OF "RAPID BURST FIRE". Which it IS with the application of a rubber band.

But don't change your habit of attacking the messenger as a way of ignoring the message.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

NY Times Editorial re PLCAA [View all] TeddyR Mar 2016 OP

Ever heard of 'bump fire'? nt flamin lib Mar 2016 #1

Another semi-mythical beast never linked to any actual deaths or crimes. nt hack89 Mar 2016 #2

Only problem is Remington doesn't sell useless aftermarket toys to their sporting rifles. ileus Mar 2016 #3

how would Remington be liable? Duckhunter935 Mar 2016 #5

are you for accuracy or not in reporting? Duckhunter935 Mar 2016 #6

Yes. But NYT hasn't, since this hat & cane expression ain't mentioned in its agitprop. NT. Eleanors38 Mar 2016 #7

I'm just using the gun nut tactic of being excruciatingly precise. flamin lib Mar 2016 #9

Heh-heh. Eleanors38 Mar 2016 #10

"I'm just using the gun nut tactic........" pablo_marmol Mar 2016 #14

intentionally misleading...when are they not. ileus Mar 2016 #4

The NYT full well knows it is deceiving. Why MSM has lost credibility on gun issues. Eleanors38 Mar 2016 #8

Technology can be modified... CompanyFirstSergeant Mar 2016 #11

Then under this theory, should not the automobile manufacturer be held liable for the use of their Big_Mike Mar 2016 #12

Please don't try to inject logic into these things, it makes the control folks sad DonP Mar 2016 #13