Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

National Security & Defense

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Eugene

(65,016 posts)
Tue Mar 19, 2019, 12:25 PM Mar 2019

New Air Force One jets and hangars to cost 33% more than expected, Pentagon says [View all]

Source: New York Daily News

New Air Force One jets and hangars to cost 33% more than expected, Pentagon says

By DAVID MATTHEWS
| NEW YORK DAILY NEWS |
MAR 18, 2019 | 10:00 PM

Purchasing and outfitting two Boeing 747-style jets for the new Air Force One fleet will cost ,35% more than previously estimated, the Pentagon says in documents reported Monday.

The project is now estimated to cost $5.3 billion, the Pentagon’s fiscal 2020 budget proposal says. That’s $1.4 billion more than President Trump has claimed the program will cost, Defense One reported.

Air Force officials have long believed privately that Trump’s estimate of the project’s cost was too low, Defense One said.

Two Boeing 747 jets — originally purchased by but never delivered to a now-defunct Russian airline — are parked at an aircraft boneyard in the Mojave Desert awaiting conversion into presidential jets.

-snip-


Read more: https://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/ny-news-pentagon-bumps-up-air-force-one-costs-20190318-story.html

______________________________________________________________________

Related: Air Force One: New Estimate Bumps Total Cost By Nearly One-Third (Defense One)
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»National Security & Defense»New Air Force One jets an...»Reply #0