Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sports

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(128,183 posts)
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 09:01 PM Nov 2021

At least Rolovich was honest; not so with Packers' Rodgers [View all]

Who knew there would be a sports figure that could make anti-vaxxer Nick Rolovich look almost good?

At least the former Washington State football coach didn’t lie about his intention to resist the vaccIne mandate required of nearly all state employees. He was up front in July, never wavered despite the self-inflicted damage done to him, his assistants and the school’s short-term reputation, and was fired. Inevitably, he sued the school. But there was at least a sliver of good fortune for eastern Washington attorneys who specialize in frivolous litigation.

Rolovich should send a gift to Aaron Rodgers. I don’t know what is appropriate, exactly, between anti-vaxxers. Maybe autograph a painting of a flat Earth, signing it, “The moon is all cheese too — just like Wisconsin!”

As you may have heard, the Packers quarterback, winner of the NFL’s most valuable player award a year ago who was making a worthy run for two in a row this season, tested positive for COVID-19 Wednesday, and is certain to sit out Sunday’s anticipated game with the Kansas City Chiefs.

https://www.sportspressnw.com/2249726/2021/at-least-rolovich-was-honest-not-so-with-packers-rodgers

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mr. Smartest Man in the Room SallyHemmings Nov 2021 #1
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Sports»At least Rolovich was hon...»Reply #0