Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Baseball

In reply to the discussion: Rule changes to MLB [View all]

ProfessorGAC

(73,591 posts)
16. Games Are Almost Exactly 34 Minutes Shorter Than..
Sun Jun 29, 2025, 08:44 PM
Jun 29

...the average of 3 years prior to the rule change.
Still way longer than the 50s, 60s, & at least half the 70s, but much shorter.
I agree with you on the shift, but part of what screwed things up was the refusal of hitters to hit to the opposite field. Perhaps, with a more aggressive running game, that tactic would have been employed more, but hitters just tried harder to pull and lift, defeating the shift with a home run. Geez a simple bunt down the first base line would be nearly an automatic single.
They needed to change the rule because hitters & managers were too stubborn.
I'm ambivalent on the ghost runner, since only about 1 in 12 games go to extra innings. I'm not nuts about the rule, but I think the impact is minimal.
I too, am good with pitcher checks.f

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Baseball»Rule changes to MLB»Reply #16