Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gtar100

(4,192 posts)
20. Ok, I've had a chance to ponder what you've written.
Mon Jul 29, 2019, 10:32 PM
Jul 2019

Apparently the words I'm using aren't really conveying the spirit in which they are intended. I blame myself for being very amateurish in my posts.

I'm not a scientist (obviously) but it seems to be the standard we are all held to in explaining everything. Science focused solely on physical phenomenon explains many things but it is not complete, not to me. Further, I view mind and spirit as domains independent of the physical world, similar to viewing time and space as separate but interdependent phenomenon. They have their physical representations in the form of our brains and nervous systems but they are ultimately not the result of physical processes, they are the reason for them. Bodies exist as expressions of mind and spirit. And as bodies develop (evolve) into more complex organisms, they are able to express that much more into the physical world. It's an exploration of consciousness and its possibilities in physical form. That's backwards from the materialist perspective but it has explained much to me, including the history and practice of magic (a whole other long topic).

Agree or disagree doesn't really matter at this point. All this is to say, the "self-evident" BS comes from the original op throwing out the word "reality" as if it were an obvious thing we would all know if we just dropped the religious bullshit. In the same vein, your statement, "the reality we all live in" appears to have the apparent assumption that we all know what that means. Most people would just nod and say yes but I think that glosses over details that really do make a difference. In everyday life, that's probably as far as it needs to go but I don't think so in this forum about religion since reality is its central subject (a point of obvious contention). The story about the elephant and the the three blind men conveys this notion. Maybe we're not all blind but our senses are limited and our experiences subjective.

That's my take in a nutshell. It can be interesting to compare notes on our experiences and observations and our resultant beliefs about life but it can also be a minefield. More often than not, the response is either "who the fuck cares" or "that's bullshit"...full stop. I'm not really that good at conveying my thoughts out loud so don't normally push it beyond that. I'm trying to be more expressive in this forum than I am face to face; and I do appreciate the banter...sometimes.

Thank you for your thoughtful response. I'll try to add an answer to the other thread you reference.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

To repeat... NeoGreen Jul 2019 #1
... Major Nikon Jul 2019 #14
40%. Right around the tangerine Nazi's approval rating. n/t Downtown Hound Jul 2019 #2
Hmmm! Do you think there might be a connection? smirkymonkey Jul 2019 #4
Sad and horrifying. SamKnause Jul 2019 #3
"Fake Christians", amirite? Act_of_Reparation Jul 2019 #5
Get back in the cave. Voltaire2 Jul 2019 #11
I love it :) uriel1972 Jul 2019 #25
Someone here works overtime pretending literalism is an outlier Major Nikon Jul 2019 #15
Yeah, but they've all been reading their Bibles wrong. Act_of_Reparation Jul 2019 #21
Is reality black and white? gtar100 Jul 2019 #6
Really?... NeoGreen Jul 2019 #8
You assume too much. I gave a description of what I'm hearing from the smart kids. gtar100 Jul 2019 #10
Ok so you are part of the 40%. Voltaire2 Jul 2019 #12
Sure, it'll make it easier on you to just toss me into a 40% category. gtar100 Jul 2019 #13
With all due respect, you can take your 'self'evident' strawman... NeoGreen Jul 2019 #16
Ok, I've had a chance to ponder what you've written. gtar100 Jul 2019 #20
Like it or not, science is what's used to describe reality Major Nikon Jul 2019 #22
uh how can you determine these non-physical things... uriel1972 Jul 2019 #23
By "smart kids" do you mean educated people? Mariana Jul 2019 #19
You might want to read the OP again Major Nikon Jul 2019 #17
This poll didn't ask about any of the things you're going on about here. Mariana Jul 2019 #18
They couldn't analyze a turd into a toilet. Karadeniz Jul 2019 #7
But apparently, 40% love... NeoGreen Jul 2019 #9
Please tell me how you come to this conclusion... uriel1972 Jul 2019 #24
There's your Trump base right there qazplm135 Jul 2019 #26
God would never accept responsibility for creating flawed creatures democratisphere Jul 2019 #27
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Gallup: 40% of Americans ...»Reply #20