Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

uriel1972

(4,261 posts)

11. Heh I didn't think it needed the sarcasm tag

Reply to Major Nikon (Reply #10)

Mon May 31, 2021, 12:09 AM

May 2021

But, yes I am fully on boatd with your post boots and all.

All the literalists tie themselves in knots with exegis while pounding away 13 to the dozen about the bible not needing any form of exegis. If it wasn't so dangerous I would be amused.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New Bible that includes Constitution creates controversy before it even hits market [View all] Mosby May 2021 OP

Doesn't the constitution say separation of church and state in article one amendment ? kimbutgar May 2021 #1

What a marketing gimmick. Which "patriot" is trying to make a fortune Arkansas Granny May 2021 #2

Which version is the 'correct' underlying Bible? keithbvadu2 May 2021 #3

Religiously ignorant sanatanadharma May 2021 #4

this is not the Onion? Or Borowitz? rurallib May 2021 #5

Both The Bible and The Constitution are essentially meaningless without no_hypocrisy May 2021 #6

but rhe Bible is literally true doncha know... uriel1972 May 2021 #7

Yes, but actually no Major Nikon May 2021 #10

Heh I didn't think it needed the sarcasm tag uriel1972 May 2021 #11

There is a pretty big difference Major Nikon May 2021 #9

This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby May 2021 #8