The Science of Denying Science. First in a series. [View all]

In light of recent discussions I've had on the subject of Astro/Heliophysics, I have decided to start posting stories in which the leaders of the field admit to how wrong they have been... which is usually followed by a "fix" with the term "dark" in it's name.

We can not proclaim to hold the scientific method up as a beacon of sanity in a time when basic scientific facts such as evolution, and biology, are under attack by religious zealots, while "dirty snowballs" careens through a 1,000,000° Kelvin corona without completely sublimating directly from solid thru liquid and gas to plasma.

Allowing this to continue leaves the scientific method open to bastardization by those who want to teach religion in science class, or deny the effects of pollution because somebody thought "global warming" was a brilliant marketing idea.

It is not my intention to propose new theories, but simply to point out the glaring hole in modern astrophysics that has the effect of denying the existence of a major force that touches and animates everything in the universe. I will, however post, on occasion, laboratory experiments that supports this point of view.

I will pose these 2 fundamental question for those open minded enough to ask:

1) If space is electrically neutral, as mainstream astronomy experts claim, and everything we see in the heavens are the results of friction, shock-waves, and gravity alone, then why do these same scientists measure these energetic events in Electron Volts and Amperes?

2) If a comet is a "dirty snowball", then why do they give off X-Rays?

And for our first in this series...

Massive GRB sends theories ’down the drain’.


“Some of our theories are just going down the drain,” said Charles Dermer, an astrophysicist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico and a member of one of the teams reporting on their observations of the burst, known as GRB 130427A.