Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiendish Thingy

(20,004 posts)
2. Some tips to help screen out bad science or non-science masquerading as science:
Tue Dec 6, 2022, 02:30 PM
Dec 2022
Avoid “pre-publication” studies- these are reports of data implying conclusions, but have not been peer reviewed or screened for publication. These are often just thinly veiled press releases to generate headlines and stimulate investor interest.

Avoid meta-analyses- meta analyses have a high risk for bias, as they are a collection of studies, often cherry picked by someone with an agenda. The flaws of each individual study are masked when the aggregator states something like “in a review of 20 studies, x results was found x% of the time”.

Avoid “preliminary studies” or “preliminary data”- preliminary studies are often very small data sets that cannot be generalized to the larger population. Always look for the “n” of number of subjects. If the n= dozens, rather than hundreds, or preferably thousands of subjects, beware. If there no human subjects, be especially careful about drawing any conclusions from the study.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Lots of bad science still...»Reply #2