Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

Showing Original Post only (View all)

NNadir

(36,045 posts)
Sun Nov 5, 2023, 12:21 PM Nov 2023

Methane Releases from Septic Tanks and the Frequency of Emptying. [View all]

The paper to which I'll refer in this post is this one: Challenges to Accurate Estimation of Methane Emission from Septic Tanks with Long Emptying Intervals Jakpong Moonkawin, Loi T. Huynh, Mariane Y. Schneider, Shigeo Fujii, Shinya Echigo, Lien P. H. Nguyen, Thu-Huong T. Hoang, Hai T. Huynh, and Hidenori Harada Environmental Science & Technology 2023 57 (43), 16575-16584

The paper is open to the public for free reading, but I will briefly excerpt some interesting facts in it below.

Very recently I referred in this space to the issue of the "great unmentionable," septic waste.

Changing the Language We Use About Handling, Well, to Put It Graphically, Shit: Describing Sanitation Systems.

After dangerous fossil fuel (and bioenergy) waste, aka, "air pollution and climate change," septic waste is the second largest waste releated killer on the planet, and is responsible, according to WHO, for about 1.25 million deaths per year.

WHO Sanitation.

The second most prominent greenhouse gas in the atmosphere, after CO2 (about which humanity has chosen effectively to do nothing effective at all) is methane.

I have a septic system on my property, which a few years ago, partially owing to some activities of an unpleasant neighbor, failed, a very expensive and frankly disgusting event. I installed a very modern system utilizing an aerator to replace it.

The paper cited at the outset of this post has some interesting commentary for those of us - apparently the number is rising - who rely on septic systems to handle our household effluent.

From the text:

In 2020, the population served by on-site sanitation worldwide, including septic systems and pit latrines, exceeded for the first time than that relying on sewer connections. (1) Furthermore, since 2010, more people have reportedly been relying on septic systems than on improved latrines. (1) In Southeast Asia, septic systems are used by a majority of the population (i.e., 90% in Vietnam, (2) 84% in the Philippines, (3) and 79% in Indonesia (4)). While septic systems are preferable over open defecation, they can potentially emit substantial amounts of greenhouse gases (GHGs), such as methane (CH4). (5−8) Thus, assessing the GHG emissions from septic systems is crucial to achieving climate change mitigation. (9−11) The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) approach has been widely used to estimate CH4 emission rates (g CH4/(cap·d)) based on biochemical oxygen demand (BOD). (12) The method is based on three parameters: (i) region- or country-specific per-capita BOD (g BOD/(cap·d)), (ii) maximum CH4 production capacity (0.6 g CH4/g BOD), and (iii) CH4 correction factor or BOD removal efficiency of septic tanks (40–72%). Different from the IPCC, in Hanoi, BOD removal efficiencies of 10–50% have been reported. (13) Applying the suggested BOD removal efficiency from the IPCC might lead to a considerable estimation error in CH4 emissions from septic systems with long emptying intervals. Therefore, the goal of this article is to investigate whether the suggested BOD removal efficiency can be used to estimate the CH4 emission and, if not, what alternative indicators can be used.

A septic system is usually constructed in either of the following two ways: (i) with two components, namely, a septic tank and a soil treatment unit (e.g., leach, infiltration, or drain fields) or (ii) with only a septic tank without a soil treatment unit. The septic system of type ii has to be connected to a sewerage for further treatment. However, in low- and middle-income countries, type (ii) septic tanks are frequently found and they are not always connected to sewerage but discharged to open environments. (14,15) In this study, we focused on the septic system of type (ii) which we from here onward call septic tanks. In low- and middle-income countries in Southeast Asia, septic tanks often receive only blackwater (i.e., blackwater septic tanks), while graywater is directly discharged to a combined sewer or a drain channel... (16)


The paper offers interesting statistics and references to them:

In 2010, the wastewater sector accounted for 8% of the global anthropogenic CH4 emissions, following enteric fermentation (28%), agriculture (20%), oil and gas (18%), and landfills (10%). (48) From 1990 to 2005, global CH4 emissions from wastewater were estimated to have increased by about 35% and are predicted to increase by 28% in 2030. (49) The major contributors to emitting CH4 in the wastewater sector are the low- and middle-income countries in Asia and Africa regions, (49) where septic systems are prevalent. However, the quantification of CH4 emissions and thus the implementation of mitigation strategies within this sector pose significant challenges.


Interesting, I think.

I hope you are enjoying your Sunday.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Methane Releases from Sep...»Reply #0