Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,038 posts)
4. That was, I think, a potentially very dangerous experiment. Hopefully the "salt" was calcium fluoride.
Sun Jan 7, 2024, 08:18 AM
Jan 2024

This would have mitigated the danger, by making the release very slow.

The standard way to remediate small HF spills is to treat them with a calcium salt or better yet, calcium hydroxide. On skin, where it is very dangerous, since one will not know about the contamination until it is "too late" - a hole appears in the flesh - calcium gluconate is often used.

I doubt though that there was enough calcium hydroxide in all of Los Angeles County to neutralize the HF in that tank.

In the old days, I concede, some high school chemistry teachers used to do relatively dangerous things. To be perfectly honest, my interest in chemistry derives from my high school teacher tossing a piece of sodium metal in a glass beaker and blowing it to pieces.

I should state, to be perfectly honest, that I favor HF/salt eutectics as a means of reprocessing nuclear fuels. It would be, however, a very different ballgame.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science»Missed LA Bhopal: The 20...»Reply #4