Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Science

SarahD

(1,732 posts) Sun May 12, 2024, 07:45 PM May 2024

"We have no evidence, but if we did..." [View all]

"It would be scientific and on our side." Raw milk advocates annoy me. They have no evidence for the supposed benefits. They call it fearmongering when actual science connects raw milk to various diseases. Then they propose that, if studies were done, they would be in their favor. I hesitate to propose that these people are endangering lives without any justification, but it sure looks that way to me.
https://www.latimes.com/environment/story/2024-05-12/raw-milk-enthusiasts-uncowed-by-bird-flu-risk-in-dairy

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"We have no evidence, but if we did..." [View all] SarahD May 2024 OP

The next thing ya know, these science types.. Permanut May 2024 #1

C'mon now Galileo, enough with that stuff. Think. Again. May 2024 #2

Roger that.. Permanut May 2024 #3

Thought if was going to be about Speaker Mike and illegals voting. czarjak May 2024 #4