2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Why did Mrs. Greenspan Automatically Think of Hillary When She Saw This Ad? [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)because we are not rich enough I guess, to be heard. Sexism is exactly what I call that. It is telling us ordinary women we are too stupid to do what Mrs Greenspan chose to do. Again, if she was not a public figure your defense of her would be fine.
I'm not a public figure and have been called a lot worse the Mrs something or other. Yet I saw no one rushing to tell me I had a right NOT to be called some of what these same defenders of women, have called me and others.
But again, as I said, DU is probably the worst place on the planet to talk about women's issues.
This thread wasn't about women's issues, but again WE WOMEN WERE USED AS A POLITICAL TOOL to try to distract from the real issue the OP was about.
They do it every time, look for some minute teeny unimportant word or phrase preferably wrt to women and then jump in pretending to care about women.
It has never fooled a majority of the women here. Their sexist use of women as political footballs is simply disgusting.
Meantime my reference to Mitchel as Mrs Greenspan has informed several people of something they didn't know, her close ties to Wall St through her marriage, and that is all I wanted to do.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):