2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: so Hillary is cooperating fully....and just suddenly realized they had a backup server all along? [View all]frylock
(34,825 posts)On Thu Oct 8, 2015, 11:48 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
so Hillary is cooperating fully....and just suddenly realized they had a backup server all along?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251654870
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
From the TOS: If you are bashing, trashing, undermining, or depressing turnout for our candidates during election season, we'll assume you are rooting for the other side.
The Republicans are conducting these disgusting witchhunts and "Democrats" shouldn't be carrying their water for them. This is completely inappropriate.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Oct 8, 2015, 11:55 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This seems to be a pointless alert.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Bullshit alert.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It seems like relevant information.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If the alerter bothered to read the entire TOS, Skinner defines election season as the between between having a candidate/the convention and election day. We are currently in Primary season, not election season. Politico may sketchy, but isn't a RW source. Alerter is trying to hide anything critical of their preferred candidate which isn't the job of the jury. Have an objection to the story? Then, hash it out in the thread.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):