Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

frylock

(34,825 posts)
24. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
Thu Oct 8, 2015, 11:57 AM
Oct 2015

On Thu Oct 8, 2015, 11:48 AM an alert was sent on the following post:

so Hillary is cooperating fully....and just suddenly realized they had a backup server all along?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251654870

REASON FOR ALERT

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

ALERTER'S COMMENTS

From the TOS: If you are bashing, trashing, undermining, or depressing turnout for our candidates during election season, we'll assume you are rooting for the other side.

The Republicans are conducting these disgusting witchhunts and "Democrats" shouldn't be carrying their water for them. This is completely inappropriate.

You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Oct 8, 2015, 11:55 AM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This seems to be a pointless alert.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Bullshit alert.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: It seems like relevant information.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: If the alerter bothered to read the entire TOS, Skinner defines election season as the between between having a candidate/the convention and election day. We are currently in Primary season, not election season. Politico may sketchy, but isn't a RW source. Alerter is trying to hide anything critical of their preferred candidate which isn't the job of the jury. Have an objection to the story? Then, hash it out in the thread.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given

Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Lies, lies and more lies. This should help with her Purveyor Oct 2015 #1
What exactly are they looking for? ForwardMotion Oct 2015 #2
more top secret emails mixed in with her personal emails. nt magical thyme Oct 2015 #4
Educated guess? Fawke Em Oct 2015 #20
“this whole thing really is covering up some shaddy (sic) shit,” PoliticAverse Oct 2015 #3
Clinton Executive Service Corp. I am beginning to think Clinton, Inc may have more LiberalArkie Oct 2015 #8
If I contracted a company to provide cloud services and that company backs up its servers using cpompilo Oct 2015 #5
Nobody on Hill's team thought to ask their service provider if the data was being backed up? magical thyme Oct 2015 #6
sounds about right. cpompilo Oct 2015 #7
Nobody thought to say "you're putting State Department communications on the FUCKING CLOUD?!?" Maedhros Oct 2015 #9
When you have your head in the clouds, it is important that your email be there with you virtualobserver Oct 2015 #26
I am so tired of this. What the hell do you all think she was hiding. juajen Oct 2015 #43
My company would fire a vendor who broke their SSAE16 by outsourcing backup without telling us. DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2015 #19
Secretary Kerry STILL uses a private email account, btw. BlueMTexpat Oct 2015 #10
Please stop lying. The more the record needs to be corrected the longer the story lasts Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #13
Dammit...you are proving it isn't the same thing at all artislife Oct 2015 #16
And they think the double standards involved are against Hillary Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #17
can we rummage through Powell's personal emails bigtree Oct 2015 #21
There would be no need to rummage through personal emails.. frylock Oct 2015 #31
I am not against that. The difference being..... Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #38
How did I "lie" ??? BlueMTexpat Oct 2015 #30
What keeps the story going is that more and more pieces become known karynnj Oct 2015 #36
You are the one who made the post, maybe you should let it go. Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #39
Kerry's practices are a role model of what HRC should have done karynnj Oct 2015 #22
Well, Hillary did mention the drawbacks BlueMTexpat Oct 2015 #29
I am not repeating Republican talking points - the private server is a self inflicted wound karynnj Oct 2015 #34
I was accused of the same thing up thread. Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #41
"Sec'y Kerry was able to learn from them." Aerows Oct 2015 #37
But she couldn't learn from Powell Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #42
RICE AND POWELL NEVER HAD ANY TO TURN OVER!!! Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #40
Albright never even had an email account to begin with Aerows Oct 2015 #45
oh FFS. Kerry is on record as stating that he assumes his email is a target for hackers. He did NOT magical thyme Oct 2015 #47
And this is why having a private server not under government supervision and control is problematic Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #11
Didn't the same thing basically happen Le Taz Hot Oct 2015 #12
whitewater papers. yup, I was thinking about that earlier today... magical thyme Oct 2015 #14
Had to share on account of juror 7, lol Matariki Oct 2015 #15
That cracked me up. Aerows Oct 2015 #23
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #18
AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service frylock Oct 2015 #24
Really stupid alert. Nt Logical Oct 2015 #27
Yeah, I was J2 frylock Oct 2015 #32
You made that alert?!?!? Motown_Johnny Oct 2015 #44
Naw, I was juror #2 frylock Oct 2015 #46
Excellent question. K&R. nt Zorra Oct 2015 #25
Competency is a far distant second to blind loyalty when it comes to advancement with the Clintons tularetom Oct 2015 #28
This is a never-ending clusterf*ck. askew Oct 2015 #33
are you referring to this heavily redacted email she sent to sbwhoeop? magical thyme Oct 2015 #48
No it is one of the new ones to be released by the stupid Benghazi committee next week. askew Oct 2015 #49
Keep that electron microscope humming! I'm sure eventually we'll get to the bottom of it. randome Oct 2015 #35
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»so Hillary is cooperating...»Reply #24