Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EarlG

(23,153 posts)
6. Good question
Mon Aug 25, 2025, 12:55 PM
Monday

Sometimes, posts can potentially violate multiple rules, so the system allows for posts to be alerted on multiple times -- but only once per rule. Once a post has survived a Jury for, say "No personal attacks," it can't be alerted on again for that rule. But if the same post also contains something bigoted, it can be alerted again under the "No bigotry" rule.

If the initial Jury is still in progress when the second alert is sent, the system queues the second alert but does not call a Jury. Then, if the post is removed for the first alert, the queued alert is discarded and no second Jury is called. But if the post is left alone, a second Jury will be called immediately to resolve the queued alert.

As always, the Jury system is subjective, so you should do what you think is right when serving.

(For what it's worth, when I review appeals I review them against ALL the rules, but that's because I have to -- a post can only be removed for a single rule, but it might break multiple rules. So if someone has a post removed for making a personal attack, and they appeal it, and I determine that the appeal is valid, then I'll put the post back. But if the post ALSO contains something bigoted, then I'm not going to put the post back just because the personal attack appeal was approved.)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Help & Search»DU Community Help»Policy question. If one ...»Reply #6