Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

billh58

(6,654 posts)

2. According to the Second Amendment absolutists

Reply to polly7 (Reply #1)

Sat May 21, 2016, 11:56 AM

May 2016

he could have hit the child with a hammer, or run him over with a car, or thrown him into the pool -- but instead he used a gun. Why? Because he had one, and it was designed for what the "responsible" gun owner used it for: to kill.

More guns = more death and injuries.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Texas Man Allegedly Fatally Shoots 3-Year-Old Stepson for Jumping on His Bed: Police [View all] billh58 May 2016 OP

What the hell is wrong with people. polly7 May 2016 #1

According to the Second Amendment absolutists billh58 May 2016 #2

I absolutely hate guns. polly7 May 2016 #3

Allegedly? Iliyah May 2016 #4

He will probably get a medal of freedom award from the Governor. old guy May 2016 #5