Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

Showing Original Post only (View all)

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
Fri Apr 12, 2013, 02:46 PM Apr 2013

"Disabled" "Group" suing Connecticut over new gun law defends AR-15's more than the disabled [View all]

It's a brand new "group" apparently of one.

It doesn't appear to be connected to any major or historic group that has advocated for the rights of the disabled.

What is the term when you use someone else to advocate for your own interests?

First lawsuit filed against new Connecticut gun laws
By Mary E. O'Leary, The New Haven Register
Updated: 04/11/2013 04:29:57 PM PDT

NEW LONDON — Lawsuits have been threatened against the state's new sweeping gun legislation, and the first to be filed is by the Disabled Americans for Firearms Rights, a relatively new organization.

The suit represents Scott Ennis of New London, the group's founder, who suffers from Hemophilia A, which has caused him severe joint damage. The legal move was first reported by the Hartford Courant.

...

Ennis, in his suit, says he wants to continue to have access to an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle that is on the list of banned assault weapons adopted by lawmakers in a bipartisan deal last week.

"The AR-15, due to its ease of handling, low recoil, adjustable features and customizability, is particularly suited for disabled persons in order to engage in lawful use of firearms, including hunting, recreational and competitive shooting and personal self-defense,' the suit says.

...

The suit further challenges the law for limiting magazines to 10 rounds, which it says "unfairly and arbitrarily deprives law-abiding disabled citizens, including the plaintiffs and members of DSFR, of their fundamental right to bear arms.'

Under the new rules, Ennis, as owner of one of the banned weapons, would have to register it, as well as any high-capacity magazines, but he can keep the gun and the magazines he now has and continue to use them for home defense and target-shooting. He cannot buy any replacements of the banned weapon or magazines, however.

...

http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_23007085/first-lawsuit-filed-against-new-connecticut-gun-laws
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control Reform Activism»"Disabled" "Group" suing ...»Reply #0