Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control Reform Activism

(56,173 posts)

3. The law does not even affect him.

Fri Apr 12, 2013, 04:47 PM

Apr 2013

It does not take away the AR-15 he already owns. Therefore, he lacks legal standing to bring that lawsuit. The lawsuit should be dismissed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Good catch! It's called " astroturfing" nt rdharma Apr 2013 #1

AR15 also can cause 'severe joint damage' jimmy the one Apr 2013 #2

The law does not even affect him. SunSeeker Apr 2013 #3

His named codefendant is his own LLC. Robb Apr 2013 #4

Good grief, it's worse than I thought. Robb Apr 2013 #6

Wow. But look at the bright side: CreekDog Apr 2013 #7