Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control Reform Activism
In reply to the discussion: I Am A Firearms Owner. [View all]jmg257
(11,996 posts)39. Hey - just as interesting wrap-up...
that should end this slight hi-jacking of the thread...again...my apologies.
"...Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo of New York pushed through the State Legislature gun control measures that included not only a tougher assault weapons ban but also a tighter restriction on the maximum legal capacity of gun magazines.
But after weeks of criticism from gun owners, Mr. Cuomo said on Wednesday that he would seek to ease the {Magazine} restriction, which he said had proved unworkable even before it was scheduled to take effect on April 15.
The gun-control law, approved in January, banned the sale of magazines that hold more than seven rounds of ammunition. But, Mr. Cuomo said Wednesday, seven-round magazines are not widely manufactured. And, although the new gun law provided an exemption for the use of 10-round magazines at firing ranges and competitions, it did not provide a legal way for gun owners to purchase such magazines.
As a result, he said, he and legislative leaders were negotiating language that would continue to allow the sale of magazines holding up to 10 rounds, but still forbid New Yorkers from loading more than 7 rounds into those magazines.
"
But after weeks of criticism from gun owners, Mr. Cuomo said on Wednesday that he would seek to ease the {Magazine} restriction, which he said had proved unworkable even before it was scheduled to take effect on April 15.
The gun-control law, approved in January, banned the sale of magazines that hold more than seven rounds of ammunition. But, Mr. Cuomo said Wednesday, seven-round magazines are not widely manufactured. And, although the new gun law provided an exemption for the use of 10-round magazines at firing ranges and competitions, it did not provide a legal way for gun owners to purchase such magazines.
As a result, he said, he and legislative leaders were negotiating language that would continue to allow the sale of magazines holding up to 10 rounds, but still forbid New Yorkers from loading more than 7 rounds into those magazines.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/21/nyregion/cuomo-seeks-to-ease-a-newly-passed-gun-restriction.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

isn't it funny that the anti-regulation folks all say they fear the Govt. will know their address
Vincardog
Mar 2013
#1
I fear that the NRA will do far more damage to lawful ownership of firearms that any other group.
Ikonoklast
Mar 2013
#2
and yet many will support a 'mental health' registry that is open to the public for review
samsingh
Mar 2013
#13
Excellent post. I tend to draw the line at carrying guns in public, particularly in cities.
Hoyt
Mar 2013
#5
Fee? Just as long as it wasn't punitive, covering the cost of paperwork and administration, nope.
Ikonoklast
Mar 2013
#9
I believe that can be taken care of, no reason a few dollars should keep anyone from their rights
Ikonoklast
Mar 2013
#30