Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Interfaith Group

Showing Original Post only (View all)

cbayer

(146,218 posts)
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 12:42 PM Apr 2013

The Decline of Dawkins and the Dawn of Deliberative Doubt [View all]

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/fareforward/2013/04/the-decline-of-dawkins-and-the-dawn-of-deliberative-doubt/

April 16, 2013 By Justin Hawkins



In March 2012, a crowd of atheists flocked to the National Mall in Washington, DC for the first “Reason Rally.” Billed as the “Woodstock for atheists and skeptics,” the rally, headlined by Richard Dawkins, seemed to signal a new resurgence of popularity and influence for the New Atheism.

But while atheism is still strong, the New Atheism is rapidly becoming the Old Atheism, and Richard Dawkins is in danger of becoming irrelevant. So argues Theo Hobson in an article this week in the UK’s Spectator magazine entitled “Richard Dawkins has Lost: Meet the New New Atheists.” The article describes a generation of thoughtful and amicable atheists who share Dawkins’ secular humanism but reject his acerbic tone.

You don’t need to look far for examples of this tone. In a 2012 opinion piece for the Washington Post advertising his Reason Rally, Dawkins indulges in creating fictional people who will not attend the rally, and speculates as to their reasons for living their lives as they do: “If I can’t trust the school to shield [my children] from science, I’ll home-school them instead.” He then dismisses them as too irredeemably unenlightened to participate in his panegyric to secular humanism. Yet in closing he issues an invitation – an altar call, one might say:

“Even if you are unaccustomed to living by reason, if you are one of those, perhaps, who actively distrust reason, why not give it a try? Cast aside the prejudices of upbringing and habit, and come along anyway. If you come with open ears and open curiosity you will learn something, will probably be entertained and may even change your mind. And that, you will find, is a liberating and refreshing experience.”


I took his invitation (being homeschooled through high school, it was too direct an invitation not to take) and was in the audience that day, surrounded by 20,000 atheists. But instead of receiving evenly measured propositional attacks upon religion, we were regaled with a less-than-sophisticated diatribe as Dawkins took the tone of a hired polemicist. Of his regard for theists he knew, he confessed “I don’t despise religious people; I despise what they stand for.” Of faithful Catholics believing in the doctrine of transubstantiation, he instructs his listeners to “Mock them! Ridicule them! In public!”

more at link
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
phhhhht Trajan Apr 2013 #1
Actually, I read this as a positive testament to the growth. cbayer Apr 2013 #2
So moderate and liberal atheists are offended by their own atheism? okasha Apr 2013 #3
I have no idea what the FUCK you are talking about Trajan Apr 2013 #6
Nope. That's just the crap in your post. okasha Apr 2013 #18
WTF? I am not offended by my own atheism Starboard Tack Apr 2013 #9
See reply to the okasha Apr 2013 #19
ok fair enough Starboard Tack Apr 2013 #20
The short hair is really conspicuous bananas Apr 2013 #15
I don't get the color guard / flag display on stage. pinto Apr 2013 #4
The only flag I recognize is the POW/MIA flag. cbayer Apr 2013 #5
Aaah, an alliterative announcement of an alternative atheism. Jim__ Apr 2013 #7
Good one! It could be a strong statement about a stimulating synthesis. cbayer Apr 2013 #8
A stimulating synthesis would be interesting. Jim__ Apr 2013 #10
There are those of differing persuasions Thats my opinion Apr 2013 #11
The problems with Dawkins is that he is a self-describe anti-theist. cbayer Apr 2013 #14
For a man who is against dogmatism, Dawkins is remarkably dogmatic Fortinbras Armstrong Apr 2013 #16
I wish he would tone down the rhetoric and anti-theism a bit. cbayer Apr 2013 #17
I recently saw Dawkins described as a professional atheist goldent Apr 2013 #12
I think he's accomplished some good, but it may be time for him to step aside cbayer Apr 2013 #13
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Interfaith Group»The Decline of Dawkins an...»Reply #0