Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Interfaith Group
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Decline of Dawkins and the Dawn of Deliberative Doubt [View all]
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/fareforward/2013/04/the-decline-of-dawkins-and-the-dawn-of-deliberative-doubt/April 16, 2013 By Justin Hawkins

In March 2012, a crowd of atheists flocked to the National Mall in Washington, DC for the first Reason Rally. Billed as the Woodstock for atheists and skeptics, the rally, headlined by Richard Dawkins, seemed to signal a new resurgence of popularity and influence for the New Atheism.
But while atheism is still strong, the New Atheism is rapidly becoming the Old Atheism, and Richard Dawkins is in danger of becoming irrelevant. So argues Theo Hobson in an article this week in the UKs Spectator magazine entitled Richard Dawkins has Lost: Meet the New New Atheists. The article describes a generation of thoughtful and amicable atheists who share Dawkins secular humanism but reject his acerbic tone.
You dont need to look far for examples of this tone. In a 2012 opinion piece for the Washington Post advertising his Reason Rally, Dawkins indulges in creating fictional people who will not attend the rally, and speculates as to their reasons for living their lives as they do: If I cant trust the school to shield [my children] from science, Ill home-school them instead. He then dismisses them as too irredeemably unenlightened to participate in his panegyric to secular humanism. Yet in closing he issues an invitation an altar call, one might say:
Even if you are unaccustomed to living by reason, if you are one of those, perhaps, who actively distrust reason, why not give it a try? Cast aside the prejudices of upbringing and habit, and come along anyway. If you come with open ears and open curiosity you will learn something, will probably be entertained and may even change your mind. And that, you will find, is a liberating and refreshing experience.
I took his invitation (being homeschooled through high school, it was too direct an invitation not to take) and was in the audience that day, surrounded by 20,000 atheists. But instead of receiving evenly measured propositional attacks upon religion, we were regaled with a less-than-sophisticated diatribe as Dawkins took the tone of a hired polemicist. Of his regard for theists he knew, he confessed I dont despise religious people; I despise what they stand for. Of faithful Catholics believing in the doctrine of transubstantiation, he instructs his listeners to Mock them! Ridicule them! In public!
more at link
20 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

For a man who is against dogmatism, Dawkins is remarkably dogmatic
Fortinbras Armstrong
Apr 2013
#16