Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

World Forum

In reply to the discussion: What 'costs' could Russia face [View all]

Igel

(37,076 posts)
1. Um ...
Sun Mar 2, 2014, 09:14 PM
Mar 2014

Which is the point. Speak softly and carry a credit card for buying lunch.

The sanctions won't be universal, and the raw materials are fungible. Sources will be shifted.

In three or four years all will be forgotten and the status quo ante resumed. With additional perks for Russia.

Russia will not allow itself to lose. If it does, the treaty giving it a base in the Crimea will be deemed null and void. It needs the Black Sea base to project power in the Mediterranean and easily into the Indian Ocean to protect, presumably, it's southern flank. Much like Estonia needs to. (Yup, that's sarcasm.)


The entire gambit is deeply cynical and if NATO and Obama don't feel openly mocked, they're insensate.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»World Forum»What 'costs' could Russia...»Reply #1