Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Raine1967

(11,656 posts)
5. Here's the WaPo story:
Wed Aug 12, 2015, 04:02 PM
Aug 2015
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/08/11/omalley-lawyer-alleges-legal-problems-with-dnc-debate-plan/

I think they make a really good point.

This is interesting:

Holly Shulman, the DNC’s national press secretary, said the DNC and the media outlets have agreed to the participation criteria, and she repeated the party’s view that “six debates will give plenty of opportunity to be seen side by side.”

Sandler, however, argues that such an arrangement is “legally problematic” because none of the debate sponsors can be bound by the DNC or other debate sponsors.

O’Malley, who is trailing both Clinton and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in the polls, clearly has an incentive to share a stage with them as often as possible. During his campaigns for governor, O’Malley proved an able debater, and as a presidential hopeful, he is eager for more attention.


IS the DNC making demands of ALL media or are we talking about a few cable/TV outlets?

This does appear problematic. I hope the DNC has a change of heart.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Martin O'Malley»MSNBC.com Notes O'Malley ...»Reply #5