Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Martin O'Malley

In reply to the discussion: Why Not Martin O'MAlley? [View all]

elleng

(140,683 posts)
1. BECAUSE
Mon May 18, 2015, 01:50 PM
May 2015

On April 10, Elizabeth Warren joined Jon Stewart on the Daily Show and declared, “Powerful corporations [and] rich people have figured out that if you can bend the government to help you just a little bit, it’s a tremendous payoff, and if you can bend it to help you just a little bit more and a little bit more, the playing field just gets more and more tilted, and the rich and the powerful just do better and better.” A week later, Martin O’Malley stood before a packed crowd at Harvard’s Institute of Politics and proclaimed, “Concentrated wealth has accumulated concentrated political power in the halls of our Congress, and also in many, many, many of our state houses, making it harder than ever to get things done.”

Both of these quotes are emblematic of a nascent populist movement in the Democratic Party. Both reflect a deep concern that all Americans don’t have an equal shot at prosperity. Both demonstrate a growing opposition to the centrist Democratic policies of the Clinton era—the trade policies and the welfare reform—that seemed to mostly benefit the wealthiest Americans.

Yet it is Martin O’Malley, not Elizabeth Warren, who has a proven record of accomplishing real progress on these issues on a state level. It is Martin O’Malley, not Elizabeth Warren, who became the first major Democratic politician to endorse a national $15 minimum wage at the Institute of Politics on Thursday. And it is Martin O’Malley, not Elizabeth Warren, who is seriously considering challenging Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination for president in 2016. . .

Perhaps America is ready for a genuinely populist Martin O’Malley campaign. O’Malley certainly appears to be ready.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why Not Martin O'MAlley? [View all] Raine1967 May 2015 OP
BECAUSE elleng May 2015 #1
It was a pretty good op-ed piece, right? Raine1967 May 2015 #3
Pretty darn good, Raine! elleng May 2015 #4
I find him quite intersting. Looking forward to some good old fashion Iliyah May 2015 #2
Agreed; I am as well, Iliyah Raine1967 May 2015 #5
he is NOT a candidate. Like Jeb he is just slumming for media attention nt msongs May 2015 #12
Jeb may slum, elleng May 2015 #13
Well let's talk after the 30th. Raine1967 May 2015 #14
One more thing, I would kindly ask you to take that hyperbole to a forum. This is a group. Raine1967 May 2015 #17
Bernie has announced. kenfrequed May 2015 #6
There is room for another candidate. Raine1967 May 2015 #7
Of course there is. kenfrequed May 2015 #8
Thanks kenfrequed. Raine1967 May 2015 #15
Don't mention it. kenfrequed May 2015 #18
Thank you, Raine! Koinos May 2015 #9
He's well-liked. Bill Clinton is very fond of him. MADem May 2015 #10
+1 Raine1967 May 2015 #16
K & R. n/t FSogol May 2015 #11
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Martin O'Malley»Why Not Martin O'MAlley?»Reply #1