Whether she plans to accompany him to the new place I have no idea.
Given that all the sex took place elsewhere, and I guess mostly on Epstein Island, I don't know how much she would know. She might have suspected. Before they ever married he was known for his overactive libido - he was not nicknamed "Randy Andy" for no reason. But even if she new or suspected he was effing around, she might not have known any of his partners were underage.
Charles's bad treatment of Diana, I have come to believe, was in marrying her in the first place. He was already in love with Camilla, who was married and not available (and possibly not eligible.) When he did it, he was under major pressure to sire an heir (and if possible a spare.) And I don't know about William, but I'm kind of glad the world got Harry from the marriage. But back to Charles, I'm open to evidence, but have not seen any that anyone ever fell in love because the other party was "suitable." I don't know how long he was in love with Camilla before marrying Diana, but the wedding was in 1981, so he has been in love with Camilla continuously for a minimum of 44 years. That's longer than I have been married. I'd say it would have been better for everyone involved if he had been able to be with her all along. Oh, and yes, she's "Queen Camilla," but the full title is Queen Consort, as opposed to Queen Regnant, as Elizabeth II was. She has the title but no authority with it (though she may have influence. That's between them.) If she outlives him she'll be Queen Dowager, with even less authority, though maybe still some influence. But maybe not. Queens Dowager have moral influence over their children, but William is not her child. She has children, but none of them is in line for the throne.
= new reply since forum marked as read