Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CoopersDad

(3,197 posts)
21. Here is a more full transcript of the exchange. Context matters.
Wed Jan 29, 2025, 10:57 PM
Jan 2025

I love her, not just like her, and find no fault with her comments in this context:

Exchange between John Steward and AOC:

AOC: I believe that we need to be a party of brawlers for the working class.

JS: There you go.

AOC: And we have turned into a party that caters to all those people who call themselves upper middle class, but they're actually like, kind of wealthy.

JS: You're talking about me now, aren't you?

No. No, you're not middle class at all!

JS: No, I meant wealthy, that's what I meant.

AOC: We've been chasing this affluent group and making all of these little concessions and hoping that working people don't notice.

JS: How does that manifest? If you could give us an example of what those concessions might look like, because in my mind, look one of the biggest. Issues in in my mind is over the last 40 or 50 years, labor has been devalued, and capital has been elevated. So investment and finance is king and labor is in many ways devalued. So in what way have you seen those kinds of moves made?

AOC: Yeah, I mean, I think the most famous one that comes to mind. Is Kirsten Synema doing her little curtsy when she voted down the $15 minimum wage? But it wasn't just her that was the most public expression of it, but there were a bunch of Democrats in the Senate behind her that also voted it down. People are struggling so much right now. 15 bucks an hour is nothing. The day that the news came out that I got assigned to Energy and Commerce, my staff's e-mail boxes blew up with lobbyists. Just tons of lobbyists just flooding our emails. And it is literally because of this assignment that I got.

JS: Was it like, hey, what's up, congresswoman? Just checking in.

AOC: It's very like, hello, fellow kids. Like, ohh, I was at, I was at the Bernie rally like back in the day, Like, I'd love to chat. I don't take a dime of lobbyist money. Because I am afforded that independence, because everyday people support me, I don't have to. I'm under no pressure or obligation to take a single one of these meetings, not one.

https://www.instagram.com/chantillysays/reel/DFNBlrhRXUg/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It appears to me gab13by13 Jan 2025 #1
I totally disagree! tableturner Jan 2025 #2
A. I did not say I think Dems aren't doing enough. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #13
you're right in a lot of what you say here. stopdiggin Jan 2025 #3
What "brawler" means in AOC's context.... tableturner Jan 2025 #7
I understand your point. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #15
Did you see my correction on my OP? yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #27
and I agree with about 95% of what you had to say stopdiggin Jan 2025 #34
The word choice is probably intended to evoke commitment. Frasier Balzov Jan 2025 #4
IMHO, you missed her point. Phoenix61 Jan 2025 #5
I agree...SCREW decorum! That's how the GOP kicks our asses! tableturner Jan 2025 #10
I think the push back regarding the EO's in the past couple of days yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #16
I needed to make a correction in my OP. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #18
I believe you might be wrongly hung up on the "middle class" thing. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #6
"Ocasio-Cortez said, we need to be a party of brawlers for the working class." yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #8
Cut and pasted from your OP above... Think. Again. Jan 2025 #11
Your OP states it differently. Sailingfish Jan 2025 #14
I have since realized that it wa indeed the phrase - "working class". yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #20
Thanks. No apologies needed at all. Sailingfish Jan 2025 #25
Thank you for your gracious reply. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #31
Cheers Sailingfish Jan 2025 #38
Thanks for clearing that up! Sorry about the confusion. Think. Again. Jan 2025 #35
My apologies. There was a typo in my OP. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #19
My take SilasSouleII Jan 2025 #9
I'll agree. The word "brawlers" means a lot of things n I'm not getting hung up on a word. Her intent is more important Deuxcents Jan 2025 #12
The phrase used by AOC was actually "working class. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #23
the middle class made this country? try again. NoRethugFriends Jan 2025 #37
The Revolutionary War ... Xoan Jan 2025 #17
Freedom riders. CoopersDad Jan 2025 #22
Here is a more full transcript of the exchange. Context matters. CoopersDad Jan 2025 #21
She used that phrase in more than one interview. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #24
and that is actually WAY more disappointing stopdiggin Jan 2025 #36
How I'm reading it Lulu KC Jan 2025 #26
Thank you for your input and thoughts. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #29
The notion that Democrats need to be brawlers is spot on, gab13by13 Jan 2025 #28
I think the push back regarding the EO's in the past couple of days yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #30
I like anyone that names themselves after a flower. Brogrizzly Jan 2025 #32
Thank you. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #33
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #47
Working class for populists means rural white men in swing states who used to have good union manufacturing jobs betsuni Jan 2025 #39
Right. The Biden/Harris administration implemented policies yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #48
I don't know. Elessar Zappa Jan 2025 #40
What if we are all of the above (or many of the above) - TBF Jan 2025 #41
I think you may not understand the purpose of my post. yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #42
So, would you prefer a polite and timid Bettie Jan 2025 #43
I never said anything about polite and timid response. And I never said yellow dahlia Jan 2025 #44
I feel like your concerns have some merit, however I wouldn't fret over attention to the working class emphasis.so long msfiddlestix Jan 2025 #45
I agree with you that Democrats shouldn't be narrowing their representation to particular groups. Paladin Jan 2025 #46
Latest Discussions»The Way Forward»I realize I may get some ...»Reply #21