General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: To ANY liberal/progressive, anywhere, who refused to vote for Hillary in November, 2016 [View all]Cha
(314,723 posts)The facts of Naders impact are fairly clear. His candidacy helped Bush in three ways. First, by insisting Bush and Al Gore were ideological twins, Tweedledee and Tweedledum, he aided Bush, who was trying to mute the ideological dimensions of the election, cast himself as a successor to Clintons agenda, and win on personal character. Second, he forced Gore to devote resources to defending otherwise solid Democratic states. And, third, he won enough votes in Florida to put the state into recount territory, allowing Bush to prevail.
SNIP/
Nader himself once cited a poll showing that only 38 percent of his supporters would have voted for Gore, against 25 percent for Bush, and the remainder staying home. Nader presented this as evidence in his own defense. But if we apply it to the results in Florida, it clinches the opposite conclusion. Ninety-seven thousand Floridians voted for Nader. By his own figures, he swung a net of more than 12,000 votes from Gore, many times larger than Bushs margin of victory.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2016/06/ralph-nader-still-wont-admit-he-elected-bush.html
My Conclusion.. 3rd party Nader has Blood on his hands.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):