Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,146 posts)
15. It glories defense against military oppression.
Fri Feb 2, 2024, 07:18 PM
Feb 2024

The US was the defender. The attack was to be two-pronged--up Long Log Lane to Baltimore and with landings elsewhere, blocked by Ft. McHenry. The British had gone far past the 1/6 insurrectionists in destroying American democracy, burning the Capitol and the President's house, along with a lot of DC, a few weeks before.

Now they wanted Baltimore, because it was in the way of securing a much better position in order to defeat and retake the "colonies." They were thwarted in their land attack, from Todd's estate up Long Log Lane to North Point. Stricker defended their positions and drove the British back. They burned the plantation house now on Todd's Estate, but it was rebuilt--from there you can see down the Chesapeake Bay all the way to the Atlantic. The British were also thwarted in the Ft. McHenry didn't fall and the British ships didn't achieve their military mission.

Long Log Lane is now North Point Blvd and ran in front of my high school, it was just about the only way out of the community I grew up in. My chemistry teacher got the Todd Estate placed on the register of historic places (and I don't know how many pages of deeds and grants and letters from the 17th century I transcribed with my girlfriend to help out). My jr high was General John Stricker, and in building the school they found a lot of cannonballs and other things from 1814. When the British left Todd's Estate, they didn't burn the slave quarters; those still stood in the 1970s, built in the 1600s.

I have no problem with military force to resist unjust, unsolicited, revanchist oppression.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"The Star-Spangled Banner" [View all] grumpyduck Feb 2024 OP
Different complaint here.. Permanut Feb 2024 #1
No other country finds an obligation to sing a war anthem prior to watching their gladiators re-enact battles Thunderbeast Feb 2024 #2
Nothing wrong with football. Elessar Zappa Feb 2024 #3
Are you sure about that? Zeitghost Feb 2024 #10
Wow, really? Clearly, you have never watched global sports, MerryBlooms Feb 2024 #17
you've never heard the french sing their antherm before a game. moonshinegnomie Feb 2024 #20
Most of the issues with the SSB odins folly Feb 2024 #4
I didn't have a problem with the anthem after 9/11. rsdsharp Feb 2024 #5
Flags odins folly Feb 2024 #8
Yep. Ripped, faded, filthy, displayed in all weather, rsdsharp Feb 2024 #11
The phony patriot flag flyers bug me too. My husband was a boy scout MerryBlooms Feb 2024 #19
Welcome to DU, odins folly! calimary Feb 2024 #9
It glories defense against military oppression. Igel Feb 2024 #15
I recall the anthem being shown on TV before baseball games way back when I was a kid (early 1960s) Attilatheblond Feb 2024 #13
Most of the performances are unremarkable. For the best one ever and has never been topped... brush Feb 2024 #6
Just don't go too far. SarahD Feb 2024 #7
I don't like the Star Spangled Banner. It's a song that glorifies war, is hard to sing, (Whitney's version was recorded debm55 Feb 2024 #12
Be thankful sarisataka Feb 2024 #14
As national anthems go . . . markpkessinger Feb 2024 #16
Thank you. I appreciated that. grumpyduck Feb 2024 #18
My father's favorite version was Jimi Hendrix's Raine Feb 2024 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"The Star-Spangled Banner...»Reply #15