Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Someone please explain to me how boinking a subordinate invalids an investigation [View all]Silent Type
(11,448 posts)55. It doesn't invalidate anything, but this distraction -- and poor judgement -- has surely delayed the trial.
Even before the distraction came to light, Willis was saying the trial wouldn't start before late August and might be 2025 (of course, she might have known what was about to drop).
trump is still guilty, but thanks to this distraction, it may be years -- if ever -- before trump goes to trial.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Someone please explain to me how boinking a subordinate invalids an investigation [View all]
AZLD4Candidate
Feb 2024
OP
Where is the bias of having an affair? Is it because Willis is a woman and only men can have them?
AZLD4Candidate
Feb 2024
#7
The claim seems to be that DA Willis hired this subordinate so that she could benefit from his earnings
LetMyPeopleVote
Feb 2024
#54
ok..thanks for posting....at least it would seem they are saying the affair started after she hired him
prodigitalson
Feb 2024
#62
The problem is, the Trump defendants KNOW that they are guilty as hell,
DemocraticPatriot
Feb 2024
#63
Because court shit isn't about truth, it is about rule following and appearances
RockRaven
Feb 2024
#3
If consensual, no one's fucking business except the manager and the server.
AZLD4Candidate
Feb 2024
#12
Just because they banned it at yours doesn't mean every owner is a micromanaging asshole
AZLD4Candidate
Feb 2024
#21
I agree with the poster who mentioned an "independent contractor" type relationship
ecstatic
Feb 2024
#25
Because lots of Americas are Puritan religious bigots, and because it benefits Trump.
DJ Synikus Makisimus
Feb 2024
#14
True. . .but I don't care if he was the janitor. . .it doesn't change the facts of the RICO TRIAL!
AZLD4Candidate
Feb 2024
#23
and it's a shame that if something organic develops, people need to have it put under a microscope
AZLD4Candidate
Feb 2024
#22
I'm glad this standard didn't exist with JFK. It was Republicans in the 1970s that made this crap
AZLD4Candidate
Feb 2024
#37
Dole did it in the 1970s against someone he was going to lose to. He found an extra-marital affair
AZLD4Candidate
Feb 2024
#40
I worked at a paper company and the phone company (1979-1981) Dating among co-workers was common place
LeftInTX
Feb 2024
#47
Or for government officials to have a romantic relationship with a vendor they hired getting paid with public funds.
MichMan
Feb 2024
#32
In Texas DA's are considered to be State Officials. Although they serve the county.
LeftInTX
Feb 2024
#49
I don't think it's the boinking. There's an affidavit she submitted re: timing of events.
CincyDem
Feb 2024
#52
It doesn't invalidate anything, but this distraction -- and poor judgement -- has surely delayed the trial.
Silent Type
Feb 2024
#55
If you can't dazzle then with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit. If you can't baffle them with bullshit,
AZLD4Candidate
Feb 2024
#61
My dentist had an affair with his receptionist, but that didn't mean my fillings were compromised.
Midnight Writer
Feb 2024
#58