Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kid Berwyn

(22,123 posts)
1. U.S. Nuclear Test Killed Far More Civilians Than We Knew
Thu Feb 29, 2024, 12:31 PM
Feb 2024
Hundreds of thousands of civilians were poisoned by irradiated milk, raising the previously estimated toll by a huge factor.

TIM FERNHOLZ,
QUARTZ | February 17, 2017

When the U.S. entered the nuclear age, it did so recklessly. New research suggests that the hidden cost of developing nuclear weapons were far larger than previous estimates, with radioactive fallout responsible for 340,000 to 690,000 American deaths from 1951 to 1973.

The study, performed by University of Arizona economist Keith Meyers , uses a novel method (pdf) to trace the deadly effects of this radiation, which was often consumed by Americans drinking milk far from the site of atomic tests.

From 1951 to 1963, the U.S. tested nuclear weapons above ground in Nevada. Weapons researchers, not understanding the risks—or simply ignoring them—exposed thousands of workers to radioactive fallout. The emissions from nuclear reactions are deadly to humans in high doses, and can cause cancer even in low doses. At one point, researchers had volunteers stand underneath an airburst nuclear weapon to prove how safe it was :



The emissions, however, did not just stay at the test site, and drifted in the atmosphere. Cancer rates spiked in nearby communities, and the US government could no longer pretend that fallout was anything but a silent killer.

Continues…

https://www.govexec.com/technology/2017/12/us-nuclear-test-killed-far-more-civilians-then-we-knew/144762/

Recommendations

12 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ignored by 'Oppenheimer,'...»Reply #1