Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
24. THAT is a bit-of-a-leap
Mon Dec 10, 2012, 01:43 PM
Dec 2012

The World's economic situation was much different immediately following WW2 than it is now.
The World was being divided up among the "Winners", basically Russia (Communist) vs the West (Capitalism).
The creation of the IMF and the World Bank were simply an extension of the WAR into the World Economic Realm,
another "weapon", AND it was an effective one.


"The World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) were created at the end of World War II by the U.S. and British governments. During the war the business classes of Europe were either supporting the Nazis, getting their banks and factories bombed into oblivion or they fled Europe with all the money they could carry. On the other hand, socialists, communists and anarchists had high credibility because they were the leaders of the Resistance to Nazi occupation. In order to prevent leftists from coming to power in western Europe, it was crucial to U.S. and British elites to get the business classes back into power. This required international institutions that would promote capitalist policies and strengthen the power of the corporate sector.

The World Bank focused on making loans to governments in order to rebuild railroads, highways, bridges, ports and other "infrastructure", i.e., the parts of the economy that are not profitable for private companies to build so they are left to the public sector (the taxpayers). After an initial focus on western Europe the World Bank shifted its lending toward the third world.

<snip>

The unwritten goal of the IMF and World Bank was to integrate the elites of all countries into the capitalist world system of rewards and punishments. The billions of dollars controlled by the IMF and World Bank have helped to create greater allegiance of national elites to the elites of other countries than they have to their own national majorities. When the World Bank and IMF lend money to debtor countries the money comes with strings attached. The policy prescriptions are usually referred to as "structural adjustment" and they require that debtor governments open their economies up to penetration by foreign corporations, allowing them access to the workers and natural resources of the country at bargain basement prices.. Other policies imposed under structural adjustment include: allowing foreign corporations to repatriate profits, balancing the government budget (often by cutting social spending), selling off publicly owned assets ("privatization&quot and devaluing the currency."

http://www.globalexchange.org/resources/wbimf/origins


At the time these organizations were created, they were effective Tools-of-War.
They should have been dismantled in the 60s, or at least restructured to bring them under the control of governments and accountability to The People.
Trying to blame FDR for the out-of-control monsters that these organizations have become is not sound reasoning.
SEE: Historian's fallacy
SEE: Fallacy of the single cause

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So Let Me Get This Straight dballance Dec 2012 #1
That sums it up nicely. Bibliovore Dec 2012 #7
Exactly! nt Mojorabbit Dec 2012 #21
K & R AzDar Dec 2012 #2
This where the phrase "corporate shill" comes into play. n/t djean111 Dec 2012 #3
K&R ReRe Dec 2012 #4
The TPee-Pee will make farmer's markets illegal. fasttense Dec 2012 #5
So, evidently, is Obama. djean111 Dec 2012 #9
That's horrible but.... FredStembottom Dec 2012 #11
When do they come after backyard gardens? IDemo Dec 2012 #18
They're coming after them in California right now. Trillo Dec 2012 #19
Strongly encourages outsourcing of US jobs. annabanana Dec 2012 #6
k/r marmar Dec 2012 #8
From what I've read TPP is worse than NAFTA(which is horrible). Why give up control over byeya Dec 2012 #10
One can NOT be FOR more "Free Trade", bvar22 Dec 2012 #12
Tell that to FDR who lowered tariffs and set up the low-tariff trading system for pampango Dec 2012 #22
THAT is a bit-of-a-leap bvar22 Dec 2012 #24
Anonymous have been shouting against the TPP for months and months. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #13
DURec leftstreet Dec 2012 #14
Chairman Harper is trying to ram through a similar agreement arikara Dec 2012 #15
K&R for the latest shit sandwich we're all supposed to take a big bite of with a big smile. Egalitarian Thug Dec 2012 #16
I'm afraid the coup has been successful progressoid Dec 2012 #17
oh my. limpyhobbler Dec 2012 #20
The Koch Roaches won't be satisfhied until they're supreme overlords of the universe. Initech Dec 2012 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dragging Secretive Trade ...»Reply #24