Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

IronLionZion

(50,716 posts)
73. ACLU: Know Your Rights 100 Mile Border Zone
Fri May 9, 2025, 12:25 PM
May 2025

DC is within 100 miles of the ocean, which counts as a border.

https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights/border-zone

Are immigration officials allowed to stop people in places wholly inside the U.S.?
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the federal agency tasked with patrolling the U.S. border and areas that function like a border, claims a territorial reach much larger than you might imagine. A federal law says that, without a warrant, CBP can board vehicles and vessels and search for people without immigration documentation “within a reasonable distance from any external boundary of the United States.” These “external boundaries” include international land borders but also the entire U.S. coastline.

Are there limitations to immigration officials’ power?
The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects against arbitrary searches and seizures of people and their property, even in this expanded border area. Furthermore, as a general matter, these agents’ jurisdiction extends only to immigration violations and federal crimes. And, depending on where you are in this area and how long an agent detains you, agents must have varying levels of suspicion to hold you.

We will examine specific scenarios where one might encounter CBP in more depth, but here are your key rights. These apply to every situation, outside of customs and ports of entry.

You have the right to remain silent or tell the agent that you’ll only answer questions in the presence of an attorney, no matter your citizenship or immigration status. You do not have to answer questions about your immigration status. You may simply say that you do not wish to answer those questions. If you choose to remain silent, the agent will likely ask you questions for longer, but your silence alone is not enough to support probable cause or reasonable suspicion to arrest, detain, or search you or your belongings.
A limited exception does exist: for people who do have permission to be in the U.S. for a specific reason and for, usually, a limited amount of time (a “nonimmigrant” on a visa, for example), the law does require you to provide information about your immigration status if asked. While you can still choose to remain silent or decline a request to produce your documents, people in this category should be aware that they could face arrest consequences. If you want to know whether you fall into this category, you should consult an attorney.

Generally, an immigration officer cannot detain you without “reasonable suspicion.” Reasonable suspicion is less robust than probable cause, but it is certainly not just a hunch or gut feeling. An agent must have specific facts about you that make it reasonable to believe you are committing or committed, a violation of immigration law or federal law.
If an agent detains you, you can ask for their basis for reasonable suspicion, and they should tell you.
An immigration officer also cannot search you or your belongings without either “probable cause” or your consent. If an agent asks you if they can search your belongings, you have the right to say no.
An immigration officer cannot arrest you without “probable cause.”
That means the agent must have facts about you that make it probable that you are committing, or committed, a violation of immigration law or federal law.
Your silence alone meets neither of these standards. Nor does your race or ethnicity alone suffice for either probable cause or reasonable suspicion.

Other important factors to keep in mind:

If an agent asks you for documents, what you need to provide differs depending on your immigration status. U.S. citizens do not have to carry proof of citizenship on their person if they are in the United States. If you have valid immigration documents and are over the age of 18, the law does require you to carry those documents on you. If you are asked by an immigration agent to produce them, it is advisable to show the documents to the agent or you risk being arrested. If you are an immigrant without documents, you can decline the officer’s request. An agent may likely ask you more questions if you decline a request. No matter what category you fall into, never provide false documents to immigration officials.

People who have entered the U.S. without inspection by an immigration official may be subject to expedited removal from the U.S. Expedited removal is a summary deportation that bypasses an immigration judge. The federal government says that it will only attempt to apply expedited removal to individuals who have entered the United States without inspection in the last 14 days, have been encountered by an immigration officer within 100 miles of the border, and meet certain other criteria. If you are told that you are subject to expedited removal but do not fall within that category, you should let the agents know. Also, if you fear persecution if returned to your country of origin, you should immediately inform the agents of your fear.


Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What "papers" Prairie Gates May 2025 #1
They have detained US citizens, claiming driver's license wasn't enough IronLionZion May 2025 #20
I refuse to carry my passport for a trip to the grocery store! Lonestarblue May 2025 #38
Seems improbable that they could stop everybody -- lost tourists, people passing allegorical oracle May 2025 #44
it's not legal barbtries May 2025 #61
That went out in 1968 with Terry v Ohio, when the Court invented "detention" out of whole cloth. rsdsharp May 2025 #68
Then in 1990 Michigan v. Sitz allowed "minimal" intrusion roadblocks for DUI prevention Ponietz May 2025 #76
And, of course, Pennsylvania v. Mimms, which allows them to order you out of the car for "officer safety." rsdsharp May 2025 #85
Probably not a "Real-ID" as that is now required for federal buildings and such. So just a regular DL is not good LiberalArkie May 2025 #52
That's what I was thinking. TommyT139 May 2025 #80
Papers please is really a world wide thing and has been for decades. If stopped by police anywhere in the world they LiberalArkie May 2025 #82
"I'm told" HereForTheParty May 2025 #90
Sounds targeted to me. Wonder who they were really after? flying_wahini May 2025 #2
They appear to be targeting democratic party strongholds and states. oldmanlynn May 2025 #27
Bet they wave through white people, especially those driving a late-model car. They're allegorical oracle May 2025 #46
If this is all lawful... FalloutShelter May 2025 #3
RIGHT !! Let's say it is lawful who tf wants to be part of an organization that's got to cover their faces in their own uponit7771 May 2025 #10
Nazi punkass, lawless, knuckledraggers? Magoo48 May 2025 #19
Yep, literally the Nazis cleared the jails of racist to shoot Jews and socialist in the beginning but uponit7771 May 2025 #50
Look at the beer guts on these slobs! pdxflyboy May 2025 #35
I wouldn't put it past MAGA to do this very thing uponit7771 May 2025 #51
Agree. MorbidButterflyTat May 2025 #87
I don't think sobriety check points are actually legal any more DENVERPOPS May 2025 #18
You are not required topresent ID without cause as far as I know. Cheezoholic May 2025 #54
To my knowledge... PCIntern May 2025 #4
Military ID is considered a Real ID. So Dependants, Retirees, and Reservists... haele May 2025 #11
Does Real ID prove citizenship? PCIntern May 2025 #13
RealID is proof of legal residency. haele May 2025 #15
And a non-compliant state ID does not mean the holder is here illegally. Ms. Toad May 2025 #21
My CA Driver's License doesn't have the RealID embed on it. haele May 2025 #25
Yup. Ms. Toad May 2025 #40
Can't recall the year, but Jeb Bush was Gov. of Fla., and he made everyone get a real allegorical oracle May 2025 #49
I had to show my birth certificate when I got a Real ID. tetedur May 2025 #33
Had to present my birth certificate, my marriage certificate (my surname had changed), had to allegorical oracle May 2025 #56
Pretty soon those agents of Trump's Fascist Agenda will have access to data bases thanx to the Botany May 2025 #5
That's terrifying jmbar2 May 2025 #36
Gestapo gonna do... appmanga May 2025 #6
Glory to Arstotzka! Lancero May 2025 #7
Gestapo tactics designed to instill fear CanonRay May 2025 #8
REPUBLICAN Gestapo. Call them what they are!! n/t Cheezoholic May 2025 #30
Why are they wearing masks? So fuggin fascist (R) BoRaGard May 2025 #9
I thought the same thing. underpants May 2025 #39
You'd think they would be proud of their thuggery! Show your face and your steel teeth. erronis May 2025 #45
I didn't know law enforcement could wear a mask, do the display a badge number and name? doc03 May 2025 #79
These nazi thugs will the among the first scumbags we hunt down when this is finally over. Basso8vb May 2025 #12
Only two things matter: They don't need a warrant... dchill May 2025 #14
Sounds better in the original German Hekate May 2025 #16
Papieren, bitte? n/t markpkessinger May 2025 #67
I'm old enough to remember when the GOP Old Crank May 2025 #17
When was that? IronLionZion May 2025 #22
In the 1960s-70s Old Crank May 2025 #26
When I was growing up DENVERPOPS May 2025 #24
My era also. Old Crank May 2025 #28
LOL DENVERPOPS May 2025 #31
Latter-Day Highwaymen .. masked and armed. Bo Zarts May 2025 #23
I guess everyone missed DENVERPOPS May 2025 #29
Eric Prince's Blackwater is alive and well .. by other names. Bo Zarts May 2025 #41
Aren't he and his sister DENVERPOPS May 2025 #48
Not denying the REPUBLICAN Gestapo would be doing this, especially in DC which has stricter ID requirements Cheezoholic May 2025 #32
Marisa is the real deal obamanut2012 May 2025 #42
Thanx!! n/t Cheezoholic May 2025 #43
This is third world country stuff. Especially because they're ashamed to show their faces. Vinca May 2025 #34
They aren't ashamed of shit orangecrush May 2025 #74
Yes, land of the free, republican style. republianmushroom May 2025 #37
Fuck that. relayerbob May 2025 #47
Gestapo Ferrets are Cool May 2025 #53
Large Hispanic Community bpj62 May 2025 #55
It is in the 100-MILE BORDER ENFORCEMENT ZONE LiberalArkie May 2025 #57
ICE has the authority to operate within 100 miles of a border jgmiller May 2025 #58
The more they get away with, the more acceptable it becomes. Buddyzbuddy May 2025 #59
Is that even legal? I don't think it is. BigDemVoter May 2025 #60
How is this legal? pandr32 May 2025 #62
Disgusting. Passages May 2025 #63
is Real ID sufficient or do I need to carry passport now? AlexSFCA May 2025 #64
Makes me wonder if Trump/ICE are now trafficking humans to be slaves in other countries' prisons. Attilatheblond May 2025 #65
Know your rights - 100 Mile Border Zone HAB911 May 2025 #66
How are we to know who these people are? No identification, all in black and masks and they say they Deuxcents May 2025 #77
Pardoned MAGAts perhaps? MorbidButterflyTat May 2025 #86
That's just it..we don't know. What if there are real criminals having us think they're govt officials? Deuxcents May 2025 #88
Qualified impunity, er, immunity, means no remedy exists when those rights are violated Ponietz May 2025 #89
As I understand it angrychair May 2025 #69
Break the ICE angrychair May 2025 #70
Doesn't the Constitution azureblue May 2025 #71
WTAF???? orangecrush May 2025 #72
ACLU: Know Your Rights 100 Mile Border Zone IronLionZion May 2025 #73
Let's see some I.D. ... YOU FIRST. Qutzupalotl May 2025 #75
Definitely. MorbidButterflyTat May 2025 #84
I'm not a lawyer. i was a cathar... May 2025 #78
Where are the people mobilizing to fuck with them? FirstLight May 2025 #81
Hm. MorbidButterflyTat May 2025 #83
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Marisa Kabas: ICE stoppin...»Reply #73