Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

stopdiggin

(14,154 posts)

1. you confuse the issue by using the word 'intel'

Reply to Arazi (Original post)

Sat Jul 19, 2025, 12:27 PM

Jul 19

Do you mean classified material, sealed material .. ? What type of legal restriction surrounds this information? And how did (the defendant?) come to be in possession .. ?

Short answer - I don't think using an elected representative as a 'pass through' removes and legal prohibitions placed on the material. Willing to entertain correction if needed.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Legal DUers, would a state legislator be able to read intel into the state record without penalty? [View all] Arazi Jul 19 OP

you confuse the issue by using the word 'intel' stopdiggin Jul 19 #1

Good clarification. I didn't mean intel as in classified material Arazi Jul 19 #2