Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Beastly Boy

(13,179 posts)

9. The motion is for debating the proposed agenda in the Knesset.

Reply to David__77 (Original post)

Wed Jul 23, 2025, 11:34 AM

Jul 23

A debate which will enable to defeat the motion which will otherwise remain unopposed.

In either case, as the article states, "Motions for the agenda have no practical implications and will not impact the legal status of the West Bank.'

Let the outrage hit the fan.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ken Dayenu sheshe2 Behind the Aegis maxsolomon tritsofme

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Israel Lawmakers vote 71-13 in favor of non-binding motion calling for West Bank annexation [View all] David__77 Jul 23 OP

This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Dayenu Jul 23 #1

Isn't that also the homeland of Arabs/Palestinians? brush Jul 23 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Dayenu Jul 23 #8

That's a toughie. All the way back to the Balfour Declaration and the right of return... brush Jul 23 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Dayenu Jul 23 #13

Nice. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. But you don't think it's worth trying? brush Jul 23 #16

This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Dayenu Jul 23 #17

You're kidding? You would leave? Where would you go? brush Jul 23 #19

This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Dayenu Jul 23 #22

Good luck if you leave, K.D. Nice talking with you. brush Jul 23 #25

This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Dayenu Jul 23 #27

Post removed Post removed Jul 23 #3

That seems to imply Israel should not exist sarisataka Jul 23 #10

It was a weird take EdmondDantes_ Jul 23 #15

Opening the door for full-scale Bettie Jul 23 #4

AGREE! but i would never want to vacation in those resorts. bluestarone Jul 23 #5

And with Western comp,icity malaise Jul 23 #11

What next? Lebanon? Jordan? Syria? Chicago? Ping Tung Jul 23 #6

Just expanding their ethnic cleansing purr-rat beauty Jul 23 #7

The motion is for debating the proposed agenda in the Knesset. Beastly Boy Jul 23 #9

This message was self-deleted by its author Celerity Jul 23 #14

That Alarming Poll Showing 82% of Israelis Back Gazans' Expulsion? It's Wrong Ken Dayenu Jul 23 #18

Fair enough. I will pull the reply as that link raises legimate concerns. Celerity Jul 23 #21

This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Dayenu Jul 23 #23

I have always tried to be a good faith poster. Not perfect, not close, but I try. Celerity Jul 23 #26

If this fantasy is carried out John Farmer Jul 23 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Dayenu Jul 23 #24

In a one-state solution, they should, but that idea is regularly dismissed because of Palestinian's sky-high birthrate. maxsolomon Jul 23 #28