Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

harumph

(2,883 posts)

2. It's not. In the future I'm sure some will regret their defense of how this conflict was prosecuted.

Reply to speak easy (Original post)

Wed Jul 23, 2025, 03:30 PM

Jul 23

A moral crisis on so many levels. To stipulate who started it (this round) does not in any
way mitigate how morally grotesque this has become. It might be a good time to reacquaint ourselves with lessons of collective punishment irrespective of how ethical (some) of the collective are.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Think. Again.kysrsoze

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How is this defensible in any way shape or form? (Graphic) [View all] speak easy Jul 23 OP

Yet the debate is over whether or not ICC was right to accuse Israel of genocide? Honestly, semantics does not hlthe2b Jul 23 #1

It's not. In the future I'm sure some will regret their defense of how this conflict was prosecuted. harumph Jul 23 #2

How can the citizens of Israel justify their support of netanyahu? Think. Again. Jul 23 #3

Oh no! This cannot be true.. mountain grammy Jul 23 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author Ken Dayenu Jul 23 #5

Thank you. I'll look at it again. mountain grammy Jul 23 #6

Kick nt cliffside Jul 24 #7