General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WaPo lists the names of the 18,500 children in Gaza killed during the genocide. [View all]Beastly Boy
(13,283 posts)and I quote: "killing a group of innocent people as a tool to induce a third party to act in a desired manner" being immoral.
But even that discussion ended as soon as you made your conception of morality contingent on US military aid. According to you, and I quote: "But nobody supports Hamas, so we cannot do anything about their behavior".
Just because you can influence someone's behavior to the exclusion of all others, doesn't mean you are addressing that behavior in good faith. In fact, this approach doesn't make this behavior disappear, it delegates the said behavior exclusively to the party you claim you cannot control. Mentioning Iran, Russia amd China is not an extrapolation, it is an analogy that underscores the absurdity of your argument. It's not a "versus" thing, even if we are now switching to discussing children starving in Gaza.
Hamas is not starving. Hamas doesn't care about starving Gazans. There are only two reasons for the children being starved: Hamas holding hostages and Hamas controlling Gaza. Release the hostages, disarm Hamas, and there is no longer the need to influence Israel. End military aid to Israel, and nothing will change.
Consider these simple truths in search of your solutions.
Edit history
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):