General Discussion

littlemissmartypants

(29,860 posts)

5. No face. No eyes to look back at him.

Tue Sep 9, 2025, 10:46 AM

Sep 9

Objectification. Which in any form should be at the very least objectionable.

In his case, deeply disturbing. In his case all people are reduced to his playthings.

We're all just objects in his imagination. He's completely void of empathetic human emotions.

He plays Army with the Armed Forces and the National Guard, like they're plastic toys. It's not hard to imagine what he does/has done with those he has had direct face-to-face power over and who are less equipped to resist.

It's all part of his psychopathic sickness.

We should all be terrified.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

25 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It's not a drawing of a nude woman. [View all] littlemissmartypants Sep 9 OP

Not prepubescent female body. FalloutShelter Sep 9 #1

Ultimate objectification of a person as thing to be used: no identity (head) no arms (resistance). Bernardo de La Paz Sep 9 #3

The X-Files had an episode called "Home" that was about as chilling as that sick drawing. Texin Sep 9 #17

I remember that episode! rhiannon55 Sep 9 #37

I can't listen to Johnny Mathis without thinking of that episode. cloudbase Sep 10 #51

No legs to run away. Farmer-Rick Sep 10 #50

No face. No eyes to look back at him. littlemissmartypants Sep 9 #5

Thank you for that observation. When I first saw this drawing, it allegorical oracle Sep 9 #7

This was exactly my reaction too. Bluetus Sep 9 #16

So true, but still republicans deny trump Mtnmama Sep 9 #8

"He's not an artist." Hell no!!! calimary Sep 9 #19

Rumor is they killed the boys they used. Blue Full Moon Sep 9 #10

The lack of arms, legs and head was the first thing I noticed, BadgerMom Sep 9 #15

Now that you brought up that chilling thought, who does own & have jurisdiction over that property? Hekate Sep 9 #18

I have said from the start mercuryblues Sep 9 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author Mossfern Sep 9 #27

True! yellow dahlia Sep 9 #34

And as if that was not sufficiently perverted for Trump and his kind, there's that $22,000 RVN VET71 Sep 10 #47

THIS malaise Sep 9 #2

Excellent point. OLDMDDEM Sep 9 #4

Right on the mark!! bluestarone Sep 9 #6

I thought the same when I first saw it, Silver Gaia Sep 9 #9

Might possibly be the "secret" he referred to with Epstein. n/t dixiegrrrrl Sep 9 #11

K&R. Wednesdays Sep 9 #12

Yes I agree Sea A Chell Sep 9 #13

Narrow shoulders - tick speak easy Sep 9 #14

Correct misanthrope Sep 9 #22

"public" hair? niyad Sep 10 #40

My autocorrect does that TommyT139 Sep 10 #42

Will keep that in mind. One is reminded, in the opposite direction, niyad Sep 10 #43

MaddowBlog-Why the White House's unpersuasive pitch on the 'birthday book' seems so familiar LetMyPeopleVote Sep 9 #20

This is why ... littlemissmartypants Sep 9 #21

Makes sense. Like the "fog of war," djt lives in a "fog of life." allegorical oracle Sep 9 #25

Boxing Helena Pachamama Sep 9 #24

What he drew was an abstraction that looks like a seamstress's dummy. LAS14 Sep 9 #26

Hefty? What exactly does that mean? littlemissmartypants Sep 9 #29

wide waist and hips LAS14 Sep 9 #31

Girls can go through puberty pretty early ecstatic Sep 10 #53

I was talking about the drawing. nt LAS14 Sep 10 #55

My question as well Mossfern Sep 9 #33

Keep trying. niyad Sep 10 #57

A sketch of a teenager EarthAbides Sep 9 #28

When you think about how Jilly_in_VA Sep 9 #30

I posted this last night. BidenRocks Sep 9 #32

You have it right! yellow dahlia Sep 9 #35

Somebody menttioned that before, when we first heard about this. niyad Sep 10 #41

From Ghislaine, perhaps? yellow dahlia Sep 10 #54

Perhaps. He certainly did not come up with it on his own. Coded language? niyad Sep 10 #56

Right. yellow dahlia Sep 10 #58

Like when he learned "groceries" recently. niyad Sep 10 #60

Exactly! yellow dahlia Sep 10 #61

A very frightened one. niyad Sep 10 #62

Very clearly not. "Enigmas never age." Karasu Sep 9 #36

It's just a sketch of a generic female form swong19104 Sep 9 #38

This message was self-deleted by its author littlemissmartypants Sep 10 #45

Sorry, wrong thread. littlemissmartypants Sep 10 #46

Sorry, there is plenty to be read into that drawing. Why the dismissive tone? niyad Sep 10 #59

Because the dude swong19104 Sep 10 #64

You see what you see. Others see different things, being all-too- familiar niyad Sep 10 #65

And all I'm saying is swong19104 Sep 10 #66

Jeff Tiedrich said the same thing - it's a early teen GIRL! Grins Sep 9 #39

Trump has just given every male MAGA voter who worries about his young daughter Aussie105 Sep 10 #44

Pretty sure those daughters need to be worrying about the fathers. niyad Sep 10 #63

Precisely orangecrush Sep 10 #48

We need to see DownriverDem Sep 10 #49

President Pubic Hair lapfog_1 Sep 10 #52