General Discussion

Sea A Chell

(94 posts)

13. Yes I agree

Reply to littlemissmartypants (Original post)

Tue Sep 9, 2025, 12:17 PM

Sep 9

The breasts are much higher than a mature woman would carry them. And most disturbing to me...no arms. No open space where you'd expect arms..

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

5 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Zackzzzz 90-percent FakeNoose MrWowWow niyad

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It's not a drawing of a nude woman. [View all] littlemissmartypants Sep 9 OP

Not prepubescent female body. FalloutShelter Sep 9 #1

Ultimate objectification of a person as thing to be used: no identity (head) no arms (resistance). Bernardo de La Paz Sep 9 #3

The X-Files had an episode called "Home" that was about as chilling as that sick drawing. Texin Sep 9 #17

I remember that episode! rhiannon55 Sep 9 #37

I can't listen to Johnny Mathis without thinking of that episode. cloudbase Sep 10 #51

No legs to run away. Farmer-Rick Sep 10 #50

No face. No eyes to look back at him. littlemissmartypants Sep 9 #5

Thank you for that observation. When I first saw this drawing, it allegorical oracle Sep 9 #7

This was exactly my reaction too. Bluetus Sep 9 #16

So true, but still republicans deny trump Mtnmama Sep 9 #8

"He's not an artist." Hell no!!! calimary Sep 9 #19

Rumor is they killed the boys they used. Blue Full Moon Sep 9 #10

The lack of arms, legs and head was the first thing I noticed, BadgerMom Sep 9 #15

Now that you brought up that chilling thought, who does own & have jurisdiction over that property? Hekate Sep 9 #18

I have said from the start mercuryblues Sep 9 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author Mossfern Sep 9 #27

True! yellow dahlia Sep 9 #34

And as if that was not sufficiently perverted for Trump and his kind, there's that $22,000 RVN VET71 Sep 10 #47

THIS malaise Sep 9 #2

Excellent point. OLDMDDEM Sep 9 #4

Right on the mark!! bluestarone Sep 9 #6

I thought the same when I first saw it, Silver Gaia Sep 9 #9

Might possibly be the "secret" he referred to with Epstein. n/t dixiegrrrrl Sep 9 #11

K&R. Wednesdays Sep 9 #12

Yes I agree Sea A Chell Sep 9 #13

Narrow shoulders - tick speak easy Sep 9 #14

Correct misanthrope Sep 9 #22

"public" hair? niyad Sep 10 #40

My autocorrect does that TommyT139 Sep 10 #42

Will keep that in mind. One is reminded, in the opposite direction, niyad Sep 10 #43

MaddowBlog-Why the White House's unpersuasive pitch on the 'birthday book' seems so familiar LetMyPeopleVote Sep 9 #20

This is why ... littlemissmartypants Sep 9 #21

Makes sense. Like the "fog of war," djt lives in a "fog of life." allegorical oracle Sep 9 #25

Boxing Helena Pachamama Sep 9 #24

What he drew was an abstraction that looks like a seamstress's dummy. LAS14 Sep 9 #26

Hefty? What exactly does that mean? littlemissmartypants Sep 9 #29

wide waist and hips LAS14 Sep 9 #31

Girls can go through puberty pretty early ecstatic Sep 10 #53

I was talking about the drawing. nt LAS14 Sep 10 #55

My question as well Mossfern Sep 9 #33

Keep trying. niyad Sep 10 #57

A sketch of a teenager EarthAbides Sep 9 #28

When you think about how Jilly_in_VA Sep 9 #30

I posted this last night. BidenRocks Sep 9 #32

You have it right! yellow dahlia Sep 9 #35

Somebody menttioned that before, when we first heard about this. niyad Sep 10 #41

From Ghislaine, perhaps? yellow dahlia Sep 10 #54

Perhaps. He certainly did not come up with it on his own. Coded language? niyad Sep 10 #56

Right. yellow dahlia Sep 10 #58

Like when he learned "groceries" recently. niyad Sep 10 #60

Exactly! yellow dahlia Sep 10 #61

A very frightened one. niyad Sep 10 #62

Very clearly not. "Enigmas never age." Karasu Sep 9 #36

It's just a sketch of a generic female form swong19104 Sep 9 #38

This message was self-deleted by its author littlemissmartypants Sep 10 #45

Sorry, wrong thread. littlemissmartypants Sep 10 #46

Sorry, there is plenty to be read into that drawing. Why the dismissive tone? niyad Sep 10 #59

Because the dude swong19104 Sep 10 #64

You see what you see. Others see different things, being all-too- familiar niyad Sep 10 #65

And all I'm saying is swong19104 Sep 10 #66

Jeff Tiedrich said the same thing - it's a early teen GIRL! Grins Sep 9 #39

Trump has just given every male MAGA voter who worries about his young daughter Aussie105 Sep 10 #44

Pretty sure those daughters need to be worrying about the fathers. niyad Sep 10 #63

Precisely orangecrush Sep 10 #48

We need to see DownriverDem Sep 10 #49

President Pubic Hair lapfog_1 Sep 10 #52