Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: It's not a drawing of a nude woman. [View all]Mossfern
(4,353 posts)33. My question as well
I went back to look at it and I see no indication of what I would consider as "hefty."
I was a figure painter and I know that figure is no way hefty - I taught life drawing as well so I've seen a good number of adult body types.
The only thing I can say that may be considered is that Trump never had a sense of proportion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Ultimate objectification of a person as thing to be used: no identity (head) no arms (resistance).
Bernardo de La Paz
Sep 9
#3
The X-Files had an episode called "Home" that was about as chilling as that sick drawing.
Texin
Sep 9
#17
Now that you brought up that chilling thought, who does own & have jurisdiction over that property?
Hekate
Sep 9
#18
And as if that was not sufficiently perverted for Trump and his kind, there's that $22,000
RVN VET71
Sep 10
#47
MaddowBlog-Why the White House's unpersuasive pitch on the 'birthday book' seems so familiar
LetMyPeopleVote
Sep 9
#20
Trump has just given every male MAGA voter who worries about his young daughter
Aussie105
Sep 10
#44