Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Atreus

(71 posts)
Fri Sep 12, 2025, 08:48 AM Friday

Assassination Is a Direct Attack on Democracy Itself [View all]

Charlie Kirk’s assassination yesterday was an abomination. Political violence is poison. It is anti-democratic to its core. No matter who the target is, killing someone for their politics is not justice, not progress, not righteousness; it is murder, full stop. And murder has no place in a democracy.

I will not sanitize what Kirk represented. His ideology was toxic, divisive, and cruel. He spent his career punching down, spreading falsehoods, and stoking resentment for profit and power. Society is better off without his corrosive influence. But that truth does not diminish the fact that his assassination is an outrage.

Here is the distinction that matters: his family and friends have suffered a tragic loss, and they deserve empathy in their grief. That empathy, the ability to feel the pain of others even when we despised the man they loved, is what separates us from the callousness Kirk himself so often displayed.

We cannot allow political assassination to become normalized. If we do, no voice is safe, no dissent survives, and democracy collapses into fear and blood. Political killings are not acts of resistance; they are acts of destruction. And we must say so without hesitation, without exception.

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If a lone gunman assassinating a purveyor of hate is a threat to our democracy, then surely mass shootings lostincalifornia Friday #1
Facts! Atreus Friday #8
Who decides who fits the description of purveyor of hate? RoseTrellis Friday #12
I leave it to you to "debate" who is a purveyor of hate or not. I don't have any confusion about it, and I sure lostincalifornia Friday #17
This message was self-deleted by its author Random Person Friday #21
Every time Trump's polls drop, a shooter shows up to boost his approval mainer Friday #2
yep bigtree Friday #3
What's your solution Atreus gab13by13 Friday #4
Not More Violence Atreus Friday #10
Nobody on here is advocating killing anyone. For their beliefs or for any other reason. Crunchy Frog Friday #14
Closing Thoughts Atreus Friday #16
Why is it "political violence" when it could be typical "gun violence" blm Friday #5
A point: Kirk was not a government official. This was a murder. Not an assassination. Scrivener7 Friday #6
Thank you Ghost of Tom Joad Friday #15
Killing a social media personality is not as big an attack on Democracy as killing state politicians Johnny2X2X Friday #7
Yes, and so is using a random killing to try to foment violence against political opponents. Crunchy Frog Friday #9
The problem is Trump. Emile Friday #11
I disagree Fiendish Thingy Friday #13
Motive OC375 Friday #18
This message was self-deleted by its author Random Person Friday #19
Atreus, I agree with and applaud everything in your OP -- except the subject title Martin Eden Friday #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Assassination Is a Direct...