Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This is NOT a national tragedy! [View all]StarryNite
(11,822 posts)11. They made it a huge deal because they thought it would be a good
excuse to further divide our country. Turned out, the shooter was one of them. So now it's, "hey look at the progress being made on the ballroom? Ain't it gonna be great? The most bigly and beautiful ballroom ever. Charlie who? Oh that stupid schmuck who lived by the sword and died by the sword."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
8 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Excellent way of putting it, and even though it's been shown to them
Eliot Rosewater
20 hrs ago
#102
I don't think political killings are good for nation, no matter how you cut it. Whether it's an incel, trumspter, Antifa
Silent Type
Friday
#5
That is definitely a good outcome, especially if it doesn't hurt us in elections.
Silent Type
Friday
#17
If it's a true that this was Right-on-Right violence, I am not sure how it hurts us at the ballot box. nt
Gore1FL
Friday
#71
OP says it ranks low on assassination meter, I disagree. I think trumpsters take it seriously and
Silent Type
Friday
#24
It ranks high because most everyone viewed it instead of just reading about it
womanofthehills
Yesterday
#87
Pretty much said it ranked low on totem pole. But it's not that big a deal. If I remember, WW2 started with
Silent Type
Friday
#44
It wasn't a "political killing" or a political assassination. It was an internecine battle between cults.
erronis
Friday
#56
There once was a time where people generally agreed that all ideas should be tested with 'exposure to sunlight'
ClaudetteCC
22 hrs ago
#95
I'd guess every outlet in the political online universe has somebody keeping an eye out.
calimary
Friday
#66
"Why haven't we done anything to address the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction?"
Dulcinea
Friday
#32
I assure you I have gone about my life very normally these last few days
Justice Brandeis
Friday
#31
I just saw a clip where Charlie Kirk said we need to bring back public executions, and they should be televised..
crimycarny
Friday
#39
YEP. Where was all this mourning and martyring when the two Dems and their dog ...
CousinIT
Friday
#40
And there is certainly more coverage of this bullshit than there EVER is with mass school shootings.
BigDemVoter
Friday
#47
While it's true that in both cases there was zero chance of survival from the type of wounds...
Montauk6
Friday
#53
How is Kirk's death any different than the daily deaths, in America, from gun violence?
dlk
Friday
#68
It's the sudden canonization of Kirk that I find nauseating. That he died tragically does not change that.
SunSeeker
Friday
#70
I don't know if I'd agree with that assessment. I can see the argument that it's a national tragedy in a couple ways.
Jedi Guy
Friday
#78
Nope, not a national tragedy. Just another gun nut killing, and the person killed supported gun nuts.
Martin68
Friday
#82
Agreed. I remember much less outcry when Squeaky Fromme shot at Gerald Ford.
no_hypocrisy
22 hrs ago
#94
I'm glad to say I didn't waste one second watching any M$M coverage of any of it
Blue Owl
18 hrs ago
#110