Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This is NOT a national tragedy! [View all]MadameButterfly
(3,527 posts)33. I'm clinging to MSNBC with all its faults
as long as we have it. Trying to keep the ratings up so the RW owners don't decide they can make more money on lockdowns or something.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I don't think political killings are good for nation, no matter how you cut it. Whether it's an incel, trumspter, Antifa
Silent Type
Yesterday
#5
That is definitely a good outcome, especially if it doesn't hurt us in elections.
Silent Type
Yesterday
#17
If it's a true that this was Right-on-Right violence, I am not sure how it hurts us at the ballot box. nt
Gore1FL
Yesterday
#71
OP says it ranks low on assassination meter, I disagree. I think trumpsters take it seriously and
Silent Type
Yesterday
#24
It ranks high because most everyone viewed it instead of just reading about it
womanofthehills
20 hrs ago
#87
Pretty much said it ranked low on totem pole. But it's not that big a deal. If I remember, WW2 started with
Silent Type
Yesterday
#44
It wasn't a "political killing" or a political assassination. It was an internecine battle between cults.
erronis
Yesterday
#56
There once was a time where people generally agreed that all ideas should be tested with 'exposure to sunlight'
ClaudetteCC
11 hrs ago
#95
I'd guess every outlet in the political online universe has somebody keeping an eye out.
calimary
Yesterday
#66
"Why haven't we done anything to address the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction?"
Dulcinea
Yesterday
#32
I assure you I have gone about my life very normally these last few days
Justice Brandeis
Yesterday
#31
I just saw a clip where Charlie Kirk said we need to bring back public executions, and they should be televised..
crimycarny
Yesterday
#39
YEP. Where was all this mourning and martyring when the two Dems and their dog ...
CousinIT
Yesterday
#40
And there is certainly more coverage of this bullshit than there EVER is with mass school shootings.
BigDemVoter
Yesterday
#47
While it's true that in both cases there was zero chance of survival from the type of wounds...
Montauk6
Yesterday
#53
How is Kirk's death any different than the daily deaths, in America, from gun violence?
dlk
Yesterday
#68
It's the sudden canonization of Kirk that I find nauseating. That he died tragically does not change that.
SunSeeker
Yesterday
#70
40000 gun deaths a year and this was the BIG ONE? Give me a fucking break.
NoMoreRepugs
Yesterday
#73
I don't know if I'd agree with that assessment. I can see the argument that it's a national tragedy in a couple ways.
Jedi Guy
Yesterday
#78
Nope, not a national tragedy. Just another gun nut killing, and the person killed supported gun nuts.
Martin68
Yesterday
#82
Agreed. I remember much less outcry when Squeaky Fromme shot at Gerald Ford.
no_hypocrisy
11 hrs ago
#94
I'm glad to say I didn't waste one second watching any M$M coverage of any of it
Blue Owl
7 hrs ago
#110