Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ancianita

(42,080 posts)

10. Raskin is right. Now what

Reply to choie (Original post)

Thu Oct 2, 2025, 07:16 PM

22 hrs ago

are he and Democrats going to do about executive branch websites fomenting political rhetoric.

Americans should not pay taxes to be used for fomenting political opposition on government websites.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

oasis brakester

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jamie Raskin's response to the propaganda on federal agency websites [View all] choie 23 hrs ago OP

Kick SheltieLover 23 hrs ago #1

And nothing will come of this Diraven 23 hrs ago #2

+1 dalton99a 23 hrs ago #3

Not sure Hatch Act has ever been enforced. It's essentially toothless. Silent Type 22 hrs ago #8

No time like the present. choie 21 hrs ago #17

Remember Al Gore Diraven 5 hrs ago #26

They'll care if Dems do it maxsolomon 1 hr ago #33

What we need is an unpretentious pterodactyl to scoop trump GreenWave 3 hrs ago #29

I sure as hell hope they plan on suing the administration. choie 22 hrs ago #13

I received this email from the VA LogDog75 23 hrs ago #4

You should forward that to Raskin dweller 22 hrs ago #6

Your last paragraph is correct. Boomerproud 21 hrs ago #19

Laws don't apply to trmp. spanone 23 hrs ago #5

Nice Sentiment. Just Get the Epstein Files Released (and Unredacted) for Now MrWowWow 22 hrs ago #7

But it was someone in the VA that sent out that message LogDog75 22 hrs ago #9

I don't care if it doesn't apply to the president. choie 21 hrs ago #18

Raskin is right. Now what ancianita 22 hrs ago #10

It's a blatant violation. Put it on the list for 2029. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz 22 hrs ago #11

Yep. That's about the best we can do. paleotn 22 hrs ago #12

Remember, the PedoPres brakester 2 hrs ago #30

And any person with two or more neurons to rub together know damned well... the nelm 22 hrs ago #14

I wonder if the victims could sue for misrepresentation. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz 22 hrs ago #15

drumpf and his people don't GAF JoseBalow 22 hrs ago #16

Thank you for posting this!! Sparkly 21 hrs ago #20

I'm sure AG Blondie will get right on it. surfered 21 hrs ago #21

Looks like a naked violation? Gimpyknee 21 hrs ago #22

Thank you, Jamie Raskin! yellow dahlia 19 hrs ago #23

In his first administration. . . Jimvanhise 5 hrs ago #24

My very first day in a Federal job, I was personally instructed in the Hatch Act by the manager of the facility. Midnight Writer 5 hrs ago #25

And nothing will be done about it because the party in power doesn't give a flying fuck how many laws this SamKnause 5 hrs ago #27

Hatch Act gfarber 3 hrs ago #28

Good one, brakester 2 hrs ago #31

Example here malaise 1 hr ago #32