Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hey Merrick Garland's Defenders, You Were Wrong [View all]gab13by13
(30,640 posts)24. Remember when I said that Garland waited 11 months to search Mar-a-Lago?
Garland dicked around negotiating with Trump to please return the stolen documents.
Then we hear what Smith said, that other people have been court martialed for doing much less.
I can still picture the boxes of top secret documents stacked in Trump's shitter.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
23 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Careful, you will piss of Hunter, who was nothing but a divine asset during the term....
themaguffin
Nov 4
#89
Think Garland and Biden knew prosecutions would be chitshow and might help trump. Way it turned out too.
Silent Type
Nov 3
#2
Garland was a disaster, but the real disaster was in 2016 by those who refused to vote for Hilllary and allowed trump
lostincalifornia
Nov 3
#49
I disagree. First, the republicans made it clear they would not allow President Obama
lostincalifornia
Nov 5
#103
I meant retiring prior to the 2014 midterms. Sorry for not making myself clear.
Crunchy Frog
Nov 5
#104
So you admit that BIden was probably very pleased that Garlandtorpedoed the whole thing?
Bluetus
Nov 3
#30
The problem was in 2016, and those who refused to vote for Hillary. Because of that trump appoint three supreme court
lostincalifornia
Nov 3
#50
Garland was a party to the crime, complicit. Joe should never have put him in charge in any capacity.
Clouds Passing
Nov 3
#16
Garland is besties with one of Trump's lawyers. IMHO, he deliberately threw the case. This could've been stopped.
AStern
Nov 3
#23
That was a powerful statement - people have gotten court martialed for less.
yellow dahlia
Nov 3
#38
If you want to open up "old wounds", it was 2016, and those who refused to vote for Hillary who determined what we have
lostincalifornia
Nov 3
#46
It is called obcessive/compulsive disorder. Ignoring of course what happened in 2016 when Garland wasn't even on the
lostincalifornia
Nov 3
#45
Absolutely. Those three supreme court judges that trump appointed, along with judges such as canon, had nothing to do
lostincalifornia
Nov 3
#52
Leonig is the most credible reporter that I ever listened to thank you for reporting this story.
msfiddlestix
Nov 3
#76
If this just came out, Garland may still respond to it. I'll wait for that at least.
RoeVWade
Nov 3
#84
Many wanted to give Garland time to do a proper job. He took the time and did not do a proper job. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 3
#83
Is there anything that explains Garland's action/inaction from his point of view?
ihaveaquestion
Nov 4
#93